How is an autocorrelation function computed? (Dynamic Light Scattering)

AI Thread Summary
In Dynamic Light Scattering experiments, the autocorrelation function is computed using the formula G(τ) = ⟨I(t)I(t+τ)⟩, where scattered light intensity is collected by a detector and processed by a digital correlator. The correlator performs a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) on the signal, multiplies the resulting spectra, and then applies an inverse FFT to obtain the autocorrelation. This process effectively filters the signal by itself, allowing for the calculation of the correlation over time. The average is implemented by recording the scattered intensity multiple times to ensure accuracy. Understanding this method is crucial for analyzing particle dynamics in various applications.
Salmone
Messages
101
Reaction score
13
In an experiment of Dynamic Light Scattering, how is an autocorrelation like the one in the image computed?

dls-theory-figure-1-500.png

Mathematically a correlation function can be written as ##G(\tau)=\langle I(t)I(t+\tau) \rangle##, in an experiment like the one I mentioned the scattered intensity light is collected by a single detector, then the signal is sent to a digital correlator which computes the correlation function. How this process works? Once I have a signal from the detector, what does the correlator do? Does it multiply the intensity at time ##t## with the same intensity at time ##t+\tau## simply? How is the average implemented? By recording with the detector the same scattered intensity multiple times? Can you explain very generally how a digital correlator works?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Salmone said:
Can you explain very generally how a digital correlator works?
A correlator would take the FFT of the two signals, multiply those two spectra, then inverse FFT. In effect, filtering a signal by another signal.

I expect autocorrelation could be performed by taking the FFT of the signal, squaring the vectors of the resulting spectrum, then computing the inverse FFT. In effect, filtering a signal by itself.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top