How Is Angular Momentum Calculated in Rotational Kinematics?

AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum in rotational kinematics is calculated using the equation L = (r)(p) + (1/12)mL^2(ω), where r is the position vector, p is momentum, m is mass, L is length, and ω is angular velocity. The first term represents the angular momentum of a particle or center of mass, while the second accounts for the object's moment of inertia. There was confusion regarding the vector nature of the terms, as the second term appeared scalar, but the direction of rotation clarified the result. A participant noted a discrepancy in their calculations, initially yielding a different answer, but resolved it by applying the right-hand rule. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering angular momentum calculations in physics.
Rheegeaux
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
[Note: Post moved to homework forum by mentor]

So I stumbled upon a reviewer for my physics exam tomorrow and I was wondering how the equation was formulated. Your help is very much appreciated :) ! Normally I would consult my professor for this but it's Sunday in my country today so I can't.

Question:
A uniform stick with length 3.00 [m] and mass
5.00 [kg] is moving and rotating about its center of mass (CM) as
shown in the figure. If the stick and point O both lie in the same
xy-plane, what is the total angular momentum of the stick at point
O at the instant shown?

answer:
L = (r )(p) +1/12mL^2(w) = -76.7kmm^2/s positive k hat

Picture: http://postimg.org/image/u5eeo77el/96cf1d1b/
p6.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first term ## r \times p## comes from the definition of angular momentum of any particle (or center of mass), while the second term comes from the fact that this object has a finite extent (i.e. moment of inertia). However, technically, the formula is incorrect since the first term is a vector while the second term seems to be a scalar (this doesn't disrupt the answer since you're given the direction of the rotation, just note that the formula isn't technically correct)
 
Brian T said:
the second term seems to be a scalar
ω should be a vector. Are you saying it seems to be a scalar because it is not in bold? The value is shown in the diagram as a vector (##\hat k##).
 
Brian T said:
The first term ## r \times p## comes from the definition of angular momentum of any particle (or center of mass), while the second term comes from the fact that this object has a finite extent (i.e. moment of inertia). However, technically, the formula is incorrect since the first term is a vector while the second term seems to be a scalar (this doesn't disrupt the answer since you're given the direction of the rotation, just note that the formula isn't technically correct)
how did it yield a negative answer? What I got was letter D. my solution is: (5kg)(7.50m/s)(4m)sin(35) + 1/12(5kg)(3m)^2(2.50 rad) = 95.411
Thanks for the reply, I really need to learn this before tomorrow. Cheers :)
 
Rheegeaux said:
how did it yield a negative answer? What I got was letter D. my solution is: (5kg)(7.50m/s)(4m)sin(35) + 1/12(5kg)(3m)^2(2.50 rad) = 95.411
Thanks for the reply, I really need to learn this before tomorrow. Cheers :)
I got it already *ZOINKS* I just needed to use the right hand rule
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top