How is exp(tL) rigorously defined in Duhamel's formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yugo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Yugo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am having trouble understanding how to use Duhamel's formula as a contraction to give existence uniqueness theorems for certain semi linear PDE.
To be more precise, have a look at the PDE and corresponding Duhamel formula in the wikipedia link given below:

http://tosio.math.toronto.edu/wiki/index.php/Duhamel's_formula

How is the exp(tL) even rigorously, defined? I can't find this anywhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
L here is a differential operator. Exponentials of operators, like exponentials of matrices, are defined through the Taylor's series for ex:
e^L= I+ L+ \frac{1}{2}L^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}L^n+ \cdot\cdot\cdot
where the powers mean repeated application of the operator and "I" is the identity operator. Of course, that should be applied to some function:
e^L(f)= f+ L(f)+ \frac{1}{2}L^2(f)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}L^n(f)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot
That is typically very difficult (or impossible) to evaluate for all but self-adjoint operators.
 
I see. So for example, that thing would make sense if the operator L was a Laplacian?

Moreover, if that's the case, could you possibly give me an example of using that Duhamel formula as a contraction to solve a PDE problem? I've seen this sort of thing before for PDEs like the one above with u being a function of two variables and L the corresponding (spatial) laplacian, but I didn't understand how to show that the duhamel formula has a fixed point iff the PDE problem had a solution.
 
HallsofIvy said:
L here is a differential operator. Exponentials of operators, like exponentials of matrices, are defined through the Taylor's series for ex:
e^L= I+ L+ \frac{1}{2}L^2+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}L^n+ \cdot\cdot\cdot
where the powers mean repeated application of the operator and "I" is the identity operator. Of course, that should be applied to some function:
e^L(f)= f+ L(f)+ \frac{1}{2}L^2(f)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot + \frac{1}{n!}L^n(f)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot
That is typically very difficult (or impossible) to evaluate for all but self-adjoint operators.

HallsofIvy, that is not difficult like you see! by semigroupe theory the expression e^{tL}f is the solution of the differential equation on Banach space : u'+Lu=0, u(0)=f, so for example for the laplacian,
e^{t\Delta}f is the solution of the Heat equation (for Dirichlet or Neumann conditions) which is the gaussian kernel:wink:
 
Thank you, I think I got it.
 
There is the following linear Volterra equation of the second kind $$ y(x)+\int_{0}^{x} K(x-s) y(s)\,{\rm d}s = 1 $$ with kernel $$ K(x-s) = 1 - 4 \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \dfrac{1}{\lambda_n^2} e^{-\beta \lambda_n^2 (x-s)} $$ where $y(0)=1$, $\beta>0$ and $\lambda_n$ is the $n$-th positive root of the equation $J_0(x)=0$ (here $n$ is a natural number that numbers these positive roots in the order of increasing their values), $J_0(x)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind of zero order. I...
Are there any good visualization tutorials, written or video, that show graphically how separation of variables works? I particularly have the time-independent Schrodinger Equation in mind. There are hundreds of demonstrations out there which essentially distill to copies of one another. However I am trying to visualize in my mind how this process looks graphically - for example plotting t on one axis and x on the other for f(x,t). I have seen other good visual representations of...
Back
Top