Integration techniques and Cauchy prinicpal value

In summary, Changing the order of integration techniques can change the value of an expression involving nested limits, but it is unclear if there is a general rule that can be followed.
  • #1
Stephen Tashi
Science Advisor
7,861
1,599
Is there a good reference that summarizes what common integration techniques (e.g. change of variables, integration by parts, interchange of the order of integration) can be used on integrands when one is calculating the Cauchy principal value ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_principal_value) and the ordinary integral does not exist?

It looks like a complicated subject, especially if we ask if the ordinary integration methods (like change of variables) are permitted to introduce more Cauchy principal value integrals.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I believe the Cauchy Principal Value is determined by taking a symmetric limit on either side of the singular point so those techniques will not by themselves help you determine this value although they may help you get the problem in a form where you can take these limits. Take for example:

[tex]P.V. \int_{-1}^{1} \frac{1}{z}dz=\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left(\int_{-1}^{-\epsilon} \frac{1}{z}dz+\int_{\epsilon}^1 \frac{1}{z}dz\right)[/tex]

Now in this case, I can find the antiderivative and write:

[tex]
\begin{align}
P.V. \int_{-1}^{1} \frac{1}{z}dz&=\lim_{\epsilon\to 0} \left(\log(-\epsilon)-\log(-1)+\log(1)-\log(\epsilon)\right) \\
&=\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\ln(\epsilon)+\pi i-\ln(1)-\pi i+0-\ln(\epsilon) \\
&=\lim_{\epsilon\to 0} \left(\ln(\epsilon)-\ln(\epsilon) \right)\\
&=0
\end{align}
[/tex]

And in general you could do this (taking the limit of the antiderivative) for more complicated integrals. Now sometimes the Residue Theorem can and often is used to find principal values by allowing the radius of an indentation around a singular point go to zero. But even in that case, we are implicitly taking the limit as [itex]\epsilon\to 0[/itex].
 
  • #3
I agree that the Cauchy principal value is defined as a limit. In a given problem, if it happens to be [itex] lim_{A \rightarrow A_0} F(A) [/itex] then I presume we can use any standard integration technique to find an ordinary integral [itex] F(A) = [/itex] some definite integral (in the ordinary sense of the word) of a function [itex] f(x) [/itex] with the constant [itex] A [/itex] involved in the limit of integration.

However, suppose the evaluation of [itex] F(A) [/itex] requires doing several other Cauchy integrations. How safe are the common integration methods then?

For example, consider a change in the order of integration.If your problem involves several Cauchy principal part integrations, you could end up with an expression invovling nested limits:

[itex] lim_{A \rightarrow A_0} ( lim_{B \rightarrow B_0} ( lim_{C \rightarrow C_0} G(A,B,C) ) ) [/itex]

And if you changed the order of Cauchy integration, you might get the nested limits in different order.

[itex] lim_{A \rightarrow A_0} ( lim_{C \rightarrow C_0} ( lim_{B \rightarrow B_0} G(A,B,C) ) ) [/itex]

Changing the order of limits in an expression involving nested limits can change the value of the expression. So is there something about the G(A,B,C) involved in Cauchy integration that avoids this problem?

I wondering if someone has worked out a theory of Cauchy principal value integration that is a nice system of rules and checks like we have with ordinary integration. Or are the possibilities so complicated that each problem has to be analyzed on its own merits.
 

Related to Integration techniques and Cauchy prinicpal value

1. What is the Cauchy principal value?

The Cauchy principal value is a method used in calculus to evaluate improper integrals that do not converge in the usual sense. It is defined as the average of the two one-sided limits of the integral as the integration bounds approach a singularity.

2. When should Cauchy principal value be used?

Cauchy principal value should be used when the integral being evaluated has a singularity at one or both of the bounds, causing it to not converge in the usual sense. This can occur when the integrand has a vertical asymptote or a removable discontinuity at one of the bounds.

3. What is the difference between Cauchy principal value and regular integration techniques?

The main difference between Cauchy principal value and regular integration techniques is that Cauchy principal value takes into account the behavior of the integrand near a singularity, whereas regular integration techniques do not. Cauchy principal value also requires a different approach and formula for calculating the value of the integral.

4. How is Cauchy principal value calculated?

The Cauchy principal value is calculated by taking the average of the two one-sided limits of the integral as the integration bounds approach a singularity. This can be represented by the following formula: PV ∫ab f(x) dx = 1/2 * limε→0a+εb f(x) dx + ∫ab-ε f(x) dx.

5. What is the significance of Cauchy principal value in real world applications?

Cauchy principal value is important in real world applications as it allows for the evaluation of integrals that would otherwise not converge in the usual sense. This is especially useful in physics and engineering, where improper integrals frequently arise in the modeling of physical phenomena. It also helps to provide a more accurate representation of the behavior of a function near a singularity.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
813
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
748
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top