Is a particle beam or laser beam conductive?

In summary, the use of particle beam or laser beam weapons to cut electrical wires in high voltage transmission lines of the enemy would not result in a reverse current or short circuit. The energy required to create a particle beam is much larger than what is found in power distribution systems. For photons, there may be a similar effect to what is suggested, but it would require a mirror to reflect the beam back to the source. The idea of using lasers as a missile defense system has been proposed, but it is not a practical approach due to the ease of defending against light beams with cheaper methods. The most advanced particle beam technology currently deployed in battlefields is the electro-laser, which creates an ionized path to conduct electricity towards a target but is
  • #1
lucas_
413
23
If particle beam or laser beam weapon would be used to cut the electrical wires in high voltage transmission lines of the enemy. Could the current conducts into the particle beam (or laser beam) itself and can short circuit in the weapon platform? I know ionized air can conduct electricity. Isn't particle beam or laser beam some form of ionized medium too?
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Laser is just light waves, no particles (unless you consider photons, but they won't conduct, and are moving away from the beam source. I think a beam of ionized particles might become conductive, but the particles are moving away from the source. Even if the electric wire was of the polarity and voltage to repel the particles back toward the source, it would scatter them in multiple directions rather than focusing them straight back.
 
  • #3
Photons aren't a particle beam (or plasma, ionoized, etc.) because it carries no electrical charge. So you are really asking two separate questions.
I can't imagine a way to create a reverse current in a "particle beam" that isn't basically another "particle beam" weapon firing in the reverse direction. The energy (or voltage) require to create a particle beam is much much larger than what you would find in even the highest voltage power distribution system.
For photons, there may be something similar to what you suggest. I call it "a mirror". A photon beam would be created in a laser. In practice, the people that design high powered lasers are often quite concerned about retro-reflections where the beam is reflected back into the laser resonator cavity. This can cause physical damage since high power lasers are typically operated as close as is practical to the damage thresholds of the materials used. This isn't speculation or science fiction, this is a real problem. Think about a laser to cut metal (like CO2 lasers), metals are typically pretty good reflectors. In many installations steps are taken to deal with accidental retro-reflections with things like optical isolators. Even if you don't actually damage the laser, you can destabilize it and mess up the beam.
This is why IMO, the "star wars" missile defense system with lasers was a stupid idea, doomed to failure. It's easy to defend against light beams with much cheaper defenses, like mirrors and smoke. Theoretically it could work; in practice it is a stupid approach.
 
  • #4
DaveE said:
Photons aren't a particle beam (or plasma, ionoized, etc.) because it carries no electrical charge. So you are really asking two separate questions.
I can't imagine a way to create a reverse current in a "particle beam" that isn't basically another "particle beam" weapon firing in the reverse direction. The energy (or voltage) require to create a particle beam is much much larger than what you would find in even the highest voltage power distribution system.
For photons, there may be something similar to what you suggest. I call it "a mirror". A photon beam would be created in a laser. In practice, the people that design high powered lasers are often quite concerned about retro-reflections where the beam is reflected back into the laser resonator cavity. This can cause physical damage since high power lasers are typically operated as close as is practical to the damage thresholds of the materials used. This isn't speculation or science fiction, this is a real problem. Think about a laser to cut metal (like CO2 lasers), metals are typically pretty good reflectors. In many installations steps are taken to deal with accidental retro-reflections with things like optical isolators. Even if you don't actually damage the laser, you can destabilize it and mess up the beam.
This is why IMO, the "star wars" missile defense system with lasers was a stupid idea, doomed to failure. It's easy to defend against light beams with much cheaper defenses, like mirrors and smoke. Theoretically it could work; in practice it is a stupid approach.

I read of navy with operating laser gun. So missile defensee system with particle beam weapons make better sense? Presently what is (or soon to be) the most advanced particle beam technology already deployed in battle fields?
 
  • #5
I doubt you would trivially create the conditions to create a conductive path to ground along the beam however, there have been designs of so-called electro-lasers which intentionally create an ionized challenge through the air to conduct electricity towards a target as a weapon. They work but not that well. The beam bounces around like lightning. I thought of trying a high powered squirt gun with an electrolyte but it turns out the stream of conductive fluid has breaks in it as it beads up along the way.

I believe the Navy does have a laser cannon that can shoot down incoming drones, missiles and planes but I don't think it's operational. There is also a plane based anti-missile laser system. I believe they are chemical based.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrolaser
 
Last edited:

1. Is a particle beam or laser beam conductive?

The answer to this question is not a simple yes or no. Both particle beams and laser beams can exhibit conductive properties, but it depends on various factors such as the type of particles or photons, the medium they are passing through, and the conditions of the experiment.

2. What is the difference between conductive and non-conductive particle or laser beams?

A conductive particle or laser beam refers to the ability of the particles or photons to transfer electrical charge or energy to other particles or materials. Non-conductive beams do not have this property and do not transfer electrical charge or energy.

3. How does the conductivity of a particle or laser beam affect its use in scientific experiments?

The conductivity of a beam can greatly impact its use in experiments. Conductive beams can be used to manipulate and control charged particles, while non-conductive beams are useful for imaging and non-destructive testing.

4. Can a particle or laser beam be both conductive and non-conductive?

Yes, it is possible for a beam to exhibit both conductive and non-conductive properties. This can occur when the beam is passing through different mediums or when the conditions of the experiment change.

5. What are some potential applications of conductive particle or laser beams?

Conductive beams have a wide range of applications in scientific research, including particle acceleration, plasma physics, and material analysis. They are also used in medical treatments such as cancer therapy and in industrial processes like welding and cutting.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
894
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top