Is there any counterexample to this ?

In summary, the properties of the Fourier transform mentioned in the conversation are that the function f(x) and its second derivative are even functions of x, and they are both positive on the entire interval from -infinity to infinity. This leads to the conclusion that the Fourier transform G(s) will only have real roots.
  • #1
zetafunction
391
0
is there any counterexample to this ??

let be the Fourier transform

[tex] G(s) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxf(x)exp(isx) [/tex]

with the properties

[tex] f(x) [/tex] and [tex] D^{2}f(x) [/tex] are EVEN funnctions of 'x'

[tex] f(x) > 0 [/tex] and [tex] D^{2}f(x) > 0 [/tex] on the whole interval (-oo,oo)

then G(s) has only REAL roots

is there any counterexample to this ?? thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


zetafunction said:
let be the Fourier transform

[tex] G(s) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxf(x)exp(isx) [/tex]

with the properties

[tex] f(x) [/tex] and [tex] D^{2}f(x) [/tex] are EVEN funnctions of 'x'

[tex] f(x) > 0 [/tex] and [tex] D^{2}f(x) > 0 [/tex] on the whole interval (-oo,oo)

then G(s) has only REAL roots

is there any counterexample to this ?? thanks

Are you sure you mean that you want f''(x)>0? No function satisfying this can decay to zero for both small and large x (try drawing a graph), and hence no such function will have a Fourier Transform (except in a distributional sense).

It means a different thing to have f even: it means f(x)=f(-x) for all x. In that case, if f is twice differentiable, then f'' will automatically also be even (just use the chain rule).

The Fourier transform is only usually defined for real s. It maps complex functions of real variables to complex functions of real variables. If your function f is very well behaved, so it decays faster than any exponential, you could extend the transform to complex s, but I'm not sure what benefit you get from this.
 

Related to Is there any counterexample to this ?

1. Is it possible to prove that there is no counterexample to this statement?

No, it is not possible to prove that there is no counterexample to a statement. The best that can be done is to provide evidence or examples that support the statement.

2. How do I know if a counterexample is valid?

A valid counterexample is one that satisfies all of the conditions of the statement except for the conclusion. It must also be logically consistent and supported by evidence or reasoning.

3. Can a counterexample disprove a statement?

Yes, a counterexample can disprove a statement if it satisfies all of the conditions of the statement except for the conclusion. This shows that the statement is not always true and needs to be revised or refined.

4. Are there different types of counterexamples?

Yes, there are two main types of counterexamples: numerical and logical. A numerical counterexample uses specific numbers or values to disprove a statement, while a logical counterexample uses reasoning or examples to show that the statement is not always true.

5. How can I use counterexamples in my research or experiments?

Counterexamples can be a useful tool in research or experimentation to test the validity of a statement or theory. By finding a counterexample, you can refine your statement or theory to make it more accurate and applicable.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
961
Replies
4
Views
769
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
807
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top