Legendre and Riemann: A Conjecture Comparison

In summary: Thanks for the clarification.In summary, the two conjectures imply different things about prime gaps. The Legendre conjecture says something about gaps and very little about the number of primes up to x, while the RH says a great deal about the number of primes up to x and not quite so much about gaps.
  • #1
daniel tisdal
6
0
I recall reading somewhere that Legendre's conjecture implies the Riemann Hypothesis. But the Wiki article suggests that Legendre imposes lighter bounds on the density of primes than does RH, so I would think the other way around, if anything. Thanks for any enlightenment.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
They're of similar strength, but I don't believe either implies the other.
 
  • #3
Thanks for the prompt reply. But if (say) RH entails a stronger boundary on the distance between primes, then wouldn't it imply Legendre? Or v.v.? There may be no formal relationship, but if, say, Proposition 1 implies a function is between (1,4) and Proposition 2 implies the function is on (1,8), we could safely say that Proposition 1 implies the truth of Proposition 2 but not conversely. Right? Thanks again.
 
  • #4
daniel tisdal said:
Thanks for the prompt reply. But if (say) RH entails a stronger boundary on the distance between primes, then wouldn't it imply Legendre? Or v.v.?

But they don't. The Legendre conjecture says something about gaps and very little about the number of primes up to x, while the RH says a great deal about the number of primes up to x and not quite so much about gaps.

The Legendre conjecture could be used to establish a lower bound of about sqrt(x) on pi(x), but this is far weaker than the RH. The RH can be used to prove an upper bound in the neighborhood of 2sqrt(x) log^2 x for the gap between primes, but this is off by something like a log^2 factor from what you'd need for Legendre.
 
  • #5
According to the Wiki article, Legendre implies prime gaps of the order O(sqrt[p]), while RH implies the (weaker) boundary for prime gaps O(sqrt[p]log[p]). The cite is

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legendre's_conjecture

Cramer is said to have proved the weaker boundary for RH. They seem to be comparing apples and apples--prime gaps...?
 
  • #6
I see you were more specific in the second paragraph. That answers the question, thanks.
 
  • #7
CRGreathouse said:
The RH can be used to prove an upper bound in the neighborhood of 2sqrt(x) log^2 x for the gap between primes

daniel tisdal said:
According to the Wiki article, Legendre implies prime gaps of the order O(sqrt[p]), while RH implies the (weaker) boundary for prime gaps O(sqrt[p]log[p]).

I see that Cramér managed to beat my back-of-an-envelope by a factor of log p, at least according to the article you cite. You're right, though -- it's still not enough.
 

1. What is the Legendre conjecture and the Riemann conjecture?

The Legendre conjecture states that every positive integer can be expressed as the sum of at most three perfect squares. The Riemann conjecture is a famous unsolved problem in mathematics, which states that all non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie on the critical line of 1/2.

2. What is the relationship between the Legendre conjecture and the Riemann conjecture?

The Legendre conjecture and the Riemann conjecture are two separate and unrelated mathematical problems. They are often compared because both involve the study of prime numbers and have been open for centuries.

3. Why are the Legendre and Riemann conjectures considered important in mathematics?

The Legendre and Riemann conjectures have been studied by mathematicians for centuries and remain unsolved, making them important open problems in mathematics. They also have connections to other areas of mathematics, such as number theory and complex analysis, making them relevant in various fields of research.

4. Has any progress been made towards solving the Legendre and Riemann conjectures?

Some progress has been made towards solving the Legendre and Riemann conjectures, but they remain unsolved. In 2020, a team of mathematicians made progress towards proving the Legendre conjecture, while the Riemann hypothesis remains one of the most famous unsolved problems in mathematics.

5. What are the potential implications if the Legendre and Riemann conjectures are proven true or false?

If the Legendre conjecture is proven true, it would provide a simple and elegant solution to a long-standing problem in number theory. On the other hand, if it is proven false, it would lead to further exploration of the properties of perfect squares. Similarly, if the Riemann conjecture is proven true, it would have far-reaching consequences in mathematics, while a proof of its falsity would also have significant implications for the study of prime numbers and complex analysis.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Math Guides, Tutorials and Articles
Replies
10
Views
21K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Poll
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top