Linear momentum confusion(help required)

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of momentum conservation in collisions. It is stated that momentum is always conserved, but it may not be conserved along the vertical direction if there is an external force acting on the system. The text also mentions the impulse approximation and how it is commonly used in collisions involving unbalanced forces. The conversation ends with a question about how to consider the Earth in the momentum equations.
  • #1
rick2395
3
0
There is a line written in my physics textbook it says " For any type of collision momentum can be conserved before and after the collision about the line of collision and and about the line perpendicular to the line of collision" . Well i got a question here can we always conserve momentum about the line perpendicular to the line of collision?

Since all this time i knew we could only conserve momentum about the line where no net force is acting.

If two projectiles collide head on in mid air then along the vertical direction i.e along the line perpendicular to the line of collision "mg" is acting Hence net force is not ZERO. So how ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF;
Momentum is always conserved.
Note - in a collision there are unbalanced forces all over the place ... each object in the collision may change it's momentum, therefore it must have experienced an unbalanced force.

Hence net force is not ZERO. So how?
How ... what?
Note: if a projectile falls towards the Earth due to the Earths gravitational pull, the momentum gained is balanced by equal and opposite gain by the Earth being attracted by the projectile.
 
  • #3
rick2395 said:
If two projectiles collide head on in mid air then along the vertical direction i.e along the line perpendicular to the line of collision "mg" is acting Hence net force is not ZERO. So how ?
One usually assumes that the duration of the collision is short enough that the effect of outside forces (such as gravity) can be ignored during the collision (the contact forces are much greater). This is called the 'impulse approximation' in many textbooks.
 
  • #4
That too :) though it is not uncommon for students to face questions involving quite lengthy complicated collisions like car-crashes... then it boils down to what counts as "short enough".

I was concerned at the idea that momentum may not be conserved during the action of an unbalanced force. However, for the colliding-projectiles example, it would be very common to take a "very short collision time" approach and we wouldn't normally factor in the momentum change for the Earth.

The passage that confuses rick2395 is trying to tell him that the components of the total momentum are conserved separately.
 
  • #5
Basically as far i am concerned MOMENTUM CAN BE CONSERVED ALONG A DIRECTION WHERE NO NET EXTERNAL FORCE IS ACTING but in the example of the two projectiles force mg of both the particles acts downwards and there is no force to balance them(Unlike if they would have been place on a surface because then the force mg would have been negated by the normal reaction) so a net force mg + mg=2mg is acting along the vertical direction, and i can still conserve momentum along the vertical direction?
 
  • #6
rick2395 said:
Basically as far i am concerned MOMENTUM CAN BE CONSERVED ALONG A DIRECTION WHERE NO NET EXTERNAL FORCE IS ACTING but in the example of the two projectiles force mg of both the particles acts downwards and there is no force to balance them(Unlike if they would have been place on a surface because then the force mg would have been negated by the normal reaction) so a net force mg + mg=2mg is acting along the vertical direction, and i can still conserve momentum?How?

I'm not sure what the issue is here.

The momentum along the vertical direction is not conserved in your case IF you only consider your system as being the two particles only! The fact that there is an external force acting on the two particles in the vertical direction tells you that the momentum of the 2 particles are not going to be conserved. Your text is describing a system in which no external net force is acting on that system. This is not the case here for the 2 particles.

If you consider the system as being the 2 particles plus the earth, then yes, the momentum of that 3-body system is conserved.

Zz.
 
  • #7
i get that.
What changes do i have to make in writing the equation(momentum equations)
if i take into consideration the Earth as well??
 
  • #8
rick2395 said:
i get that.
What changes do i have to make in writing the equation(momentum equations)
if i take into consideration the Earth as well??

Why can't you just deal with the horizontal component and ignore the vertical component? What is it that you are trying to find?

Zz.
 

Related to Linear momentum confusion(help required)

1. What is linear momentum?

Linear momentum is a measure of the quantity of motion of an object. It is a vector quantity that takes into account an object's mass and velocity.

2. How is linear momentum different from velocity?

Velocity is a measure of an object's speed and direction, while linear momentum is a measure of an object's motion only in a straight line. Velocity is a vector quantity, while linear momentum is a vector quantity that considers both an object's mass and velocity.

3. What is the equation for calculating linear momentum?

The equation for calculating linear momentum is p = m * v, where p is linear momentum, m is the mass of the object, and v is the velocity of the object.

4. Can an object have linear momentum without moving?

No, an object must be in motion to have linear momentum. If an object is not moving, its velocity is zero, and therefore its linear momentum is also zero.

5. How is linear momentum conserved in a system?

In a closed system, the total linear momentum remains constant. This means that the sum of linear momenta of all objects in the system before a collision or interaction is equal to the sum of linear momenta after the collision or interaction.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Mechanics
2
Replies
53
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
995
Replies
4
Views
961
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
772
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top