MCNPX - How calculate Kerma (kinetic energy released per unit mass) in Air?

In summary: I have sent you.In summary, Alexander is a student from the Institute of Radioprotection and Dosimetry, currently working on a project to calculate MGD (mean glandular dose) from women with augmented breasts. He is having difficulties calculating Kerma in air using MCNPX and has drawn a block of air above the breast, using the "tally" f6 for energy deposited in a cell to obtain the kerma in MeV/g. However, his results are low and he is seeking help and suggestions. The conversation also includes discussion on the type of radiation source and its distribution, as well as issues with the SDEF card and understanding of MCNP. The conversation concludes with a clarification on
  • #1
Alexander Camargo
19
2
Hi, my name is alexander, i am student from Institute of radioprotection and dosimetry (IRD). My project is calculate MGD (mean glandular dose) from womans with augmented breast. i am having dificulties to calculate Kerma in air with mcnpx. I drew a block of air above the breast, i am using the "tally" f6 (energy deposited in cell) for obtain the kerma in MeV/g. However, I'm not obtained good results, i obtain very low values.

I ask for help for ideas or suggestions.

thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is the type of radiation source, and what is its distribution?
 
  • #3
Hi,
Can you put your file (in ascii) ?
 
  • #4
mcnpx 2.7

Code:
C Alexander Camargo - 23/10/2018
C *******************Celulas********************************
10 2 -1.090 (-1 2 -3 4) #20 imp:p=1 VOL=149.2256511   $ espessura / thickness                     
20 1 -0.9850 (-5 6 -7 8) imp:p=1 VOL=353.4291735           $ mama / breast 
30 3 -0.001205 (-10 -11 12 13) #10 #20 imp:p=1 VOL=10.3059947 $ ar / air
C ----- Acompanhamento -----
80 3 -0.001205 (-80) #10 #20 #30 imp:p=1                   $ Mundo-Interno / universe
90 0 (80) imp:p=0                                          $ Fim do Acompanhamento

C -------------Geometrias / geometries ----------------
C ------------ espessura / thickness ----------
1 cz 8
2 pz -2.5
3 pz 2.5
4 px 0
C ------------ mama / breast -------------
5 cz 7.5
6 pz -2
7 pz 2
8 px 0.5
C ------------ AR / air -------------
10 cz 8.1
11 pz 2.6
12 pz 2.5
13 px 0
C --- Fim de Acompanhamento / universe ---
80 SO 225 $ Mundo

C area 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100.5312 0 0 0
mode P $ fotons / photons
C -------------- fonte e energia (monoenergetico) ----------------
sc1  raio x monoenergetico para mamografia                               
SDEF X=d1 Y=d2 Z=60 PAR=2 ERG=0.018 VEC=0 0 1 DIR=-1
SI1 -1 9 $ sampling range Xmin to Xmax
SP1 0 1 $ weighting for x sampling: here constant
SI2 -10 10 $ sampling range Ymin to Ymax
SP2 0 1 $ weighting for y sampling: here constant
C                                                           
C **************************** Materiais *********************************                               
C ***************************** mama padrao 50/50 **********************************   
m1    1000          -0.1140  $ H
      6000          -0.5250  $ C
      7000          -0.0060 $ N
      8000          -0.3535 $ O
      11000         -0.0005  $ Na
      16000         -0.0005 $ S
      17000         -0.0005  $ Cl
C                                                                           
C ------------------------ Pele -------------------------------
m2    1000          -0.100  $ H
      6000          -0.199  $ C
      7000          -0.042 $ N
      8000          -0.650 $ O
      11000         -0.002  $ Na
      15000         -0.001  $ P
      16000         -0.002 $ S
      17000         -0.003  $ Cl
      19000         -0.001 $ K
C
C ****************************** AR ***************************************     
m3    6000           -0.000124   $ C
      7000           -0.755268   $ N
      8000           -0.231781   $ O
      18000          -0.012827   $ Ar
C
C ************************** Tungstenio *********************************
C m4    74000          -1.000
C
C *************************************************************************
C
C                               
C ***************************** Tallies ***********************************
f4:p 30
f6:p 30
c
C
C
C
C *************************** tempo de Input **********************************     
NPS   16000000   $ Stop after XX source particles have been run.               
C CTME 120          $ Stop run after XX minutes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
I don't see a trivial error.
I suppose you have multiplied F6 by 1.602e-10 to convert in Gy. Remember that to compare results, you have to normalize to the fluence (K/phi) to obtain Gy.cm2.

Note that for me the "SDEF" is Strange. If you want a rectangular parallel beam you must write something like that "SDEF X=d1 Y=d2 Z=0 pos 0 0 60 …" but in fact I don't know what you want to simulate ...
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #6
upload_2018-10-24_12-36-30.png


i need to kerma in air, but, i found very low results. I need multiplicate my results per 16000000 to found the valor?

I want simulate a mamography machine with focal point the 60cm the breast. My card "SDEF" is configured for a one-dimensional collimated beam in direction the -z axis.

sorry for my lack of knowledge, I'm new to the mcnpx area and I'm in the third year of graduation.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-24_12-36-30.png
    upload_2018-10-24_12-36-30.png
    30.7 KB · Views: 551
  • #7
Hi,
No ! A F6 result is in MeV/g for one photon emitted
If you want in Gy you have (F6)*1E6 (eV/g)*1E3 (eV/kg)*1.602E-19 (J/kg=Gy)=F6*1.602e-10 in Gy
But you must remember that MCNP normalizes the results to one photon. So you must multiplied by the photon flux (photon/s) to have a result in Gy/s.

For geometry I am not sure to understand. Do you want to simulate a beam like this :

upload_2018-10-24_21-4-17.png

and

upload_2018-10-24_21-5-38.png


Furthermore a mamography device not emitted a monocinetic energy of photon. For example :
c00069_f069-001-9780702042959.jpg


In first approximation a photon of 18 keV like in your simulation could be ok.
Hope it's help
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-24_21-4-17.png
    upload_2018-10-24_21-4-17.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 530
  • upload_2018-10-24_21-5-38.png
    upload_2018-10-24_21-5-38.png
    3.3 KB · Views: 565
  • c00069_f069-001-9780702042959.jpg
    c00069_f069-001-9780702042959.jpg
    10.7 KB · Views: 606
  • #8
Thank you so much, you helped me a lot.

I understood everything your said, but, when I multiply my results in mev / g by 1.602E-10, I get very low results for what I want.

In cell 30 (semi-circular cylinder of air. to obtain kerma in air) i obtained = 6.01751E-05 (mev/g per history). multiplyed by 1,602E-10 i obtain 9,64E-15 (Gy por history).

my fluence obtained in cell 30 is 4.41740E-03 (1/cm**2)

I simulate one million histories. 4.867E+06 histories/minute.

please, help me in this question.
 
  • #9
Your result is 9.64E-15 Gy for one Xrays emitted by your device.
You must known the flux of your device in Xrays/s and multiplied the flux by your results and you have Gy/s
 

1. What is MCNPX?

MCNPX is a Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code used for simulating and analyzing the behavior of particles in various materials and environments, including air.

2. How does MCNPX calculate Kerma in air?

MCNPX calculates Kerma in air by simulating the interactions of particles with air molecules. It tracks the energy deposited by these interactions and calculates the average kinetic energy released per unit mass, known as Kerma.

3. What is the importance of calculating Kerma in air?

Kerma in air is an important parameter in radiation protection and dosimetry. It is used to estimate the amount of energy deposited by radiation in the air, which can then be used to calculate the dose received by individuals exposed to the radiation.

4. How accurate is MCNPX in calculating Kerma in air?

MCNPX is a highly accurate code that has been extensively tested and validated by the scientific community. However, the accuracy of the calculations depends on the accuracy of the input parameters and the model used for the simulation.

5. Can MCNPX be used to calculate Kerma in air for any type of radiation?

Yes, MCNPX is a versatile code that can be used to simulate a wide range of particles and energies, including photons, neutrons, and charged particles. Therefore, it can be used to calculate Kerma in air for any type of radiation.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top