Modelling Water Tanks: Solving with Bernoulli Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on using the Bernoulli equation to model water levels in two connected tanks. The initial equation derived assumes the velocity in the large tank is negligible, leading to a formula for the height of water in a narrow cylinder over time. However, the resulting function suggests that the water height increases and then decreases, which contradicts the expected behavior of the system. Clarifications indicate that the solution is valid only until a specific time, after which the water level stabilizes at the height of the larger tank. The final dimensionless form of the equation provides insights into the relationship between time and water height, confirming that the small tube's water level matches the large tank's height at a defined time.
Alexander350
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
Untitled.png

I tried using the Bernoulli equation to solve this. I took two points at the surface of the water in both the containers and formed this equation:
gh_{b}=\frac{1}{2}v^2+gh
This is assuming that the velocity of the water in the large tank is approximately zero and using the fact that both the surfaces are at atmospheric pressure. Then, I solved for the velocity and said that this is equal to the rate of change of the height of the water in the narrow cylinder.
\frac{dh}{dt}=\sqrt{2g(h_{b}-h)}
Finally, solving this with the assumption that h starts at 0, I got:
h=\sqrt{2gh_{b}}t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2
But looking at this function, it increases to the height h_{b} and then decreases again. This obviously does not happen; it would just stay at that height forever. So what have I done wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 1,013
Physics news on Phys.org
Chestermiller said:
Integrating the equation correctly might help.
It looks correct to me. Substituting it back into the original equation satisfies it.
 
Your equation is valid from h:0 to h:hb. So, if you solve it for h=hb, you will find your upper limit for t (call it tb).

From 0 to tb you can use your solution for h(t).
For t>tb, dh/dt=0 and so h=hb.
 
  • Like
Likes Alexander350 and Chestermiller
Alexander350 said:
It looks correct to me. Substituting it back into the original equation satisfies it.
Sorry. I misread your equation. You are, of course, correct.

It is interesting to reduce your final equation to dimensionless form as follows:

$$\frac{h}{h_b}=\left(\frac{t}{\tau}\right)-\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{t}{\tau}\right)^2$$ where the characteristic time ##\tau## is given by $$\tau=\sqrt{\frac{h_b}{2g}}$$
The level in the small tube rises to that in the large tank when $$t=2\tau=\sqrt{\frac{2h_b}{g}}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Alexander350
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top