Mysterious Candle Flame Flickering at Jazz Concert

  • Thread starter Thread starter primal schemer
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
At a recent jazz concert, a candle flame flickered in response to a specific drumbeat, despite other instruments being silent. The phenomenon is attributed to the frequency of the drum, which may create vibrations affecting the flame. This effect is similar to how low bass sounds can cause physical vibrations in a space. The drummer used a higher-pitched drum, suggesting that the flame's movement was due to the rapid oscillations of sound waves. The discussion raises questions about the interaction between sound frequencies and physical objects like flames.
primal schemer
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I was at a small jazz concert the other day, and was sitting pretty close to the stage. There was a candle on the table i was sitting on, and every time the drummer hit a certain drum, the flame of the candle flickered. There were only three instruments on stage, and the effect occurred even when the other two instuments were silent. Also, I looked, and it wasn`t due to someone tapping their foot or anything like that. and it didn`t seem to happen for any of the other drums / instruments.

So, why was this happenning?

My guess is something to do with the frequency of the drum being somehow related to the flame?

I guess we are all familiar with a large bass sound making the floor of a room vibrate (incidenty, the drum wasn`t the low sounding 'foot' drum (I don`t know the names), but one that he hit with the drumstick). Is this the same effect happening here?

Thanks,

PS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The frequency of a bass drum is so low that you can see both ends of the pressure wave go by. With higher frequency sound, the flame waves back and forth so fast (and therefore moves such a small amount) that you can't see it.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Back
Top