New Hybrid Model for the Origin of Indo-European Languages

  • Lingusitics
  • Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date
In summary, the study compared the time-depth predictions of the Anatolian and Steppe hypotheses for the origin and spread of the Indo-European language family. The results suggest that the Anatolian branch originated south of the Caucasus, while other branches may have come from the Yamnaya culture but had limited genetic impact. This conflicts with both hypotheses, indicating a possible hybrid of the two theories. The study also suggests that the resolution to the Indo-European enigma may lie in a combination of language phylogenetics and ancient DNA evidence.
  • #1
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,486
9,719
From Science (paywalled AAAS journal):

INTRODUCTION​

Almost half the world’s population speaks a language of the Indo-European language family. It remains unclear, however, where this family’s common ancestral language (Proto-Indo-European) was initially spoken and when and why it spread through Eurasia. The “Steppe” hypothesis posits an expansion out of the Pontic-Caspian Steppe, no earlier than 6500 years before present (yr B.P.), and mostly with horse-based pastoralism from ~5000 yr B.P. An alternative “Anatolian” or “farming” hypothesis posits that Indo-European dispersed with agriculture out of parts of the Fertile Crescent, beginning as early as ~9500 to 8500 yr B.P. Ancient DNA (aDNA) is now bringing valuable new perspectives, but these remain only indirect interpretations of language prehistory. In this study, we tested between the time-depth predictions of the Anatolian and Steppe hypotheses, directly from language data. We report a new framework for the chronology and divergence sequence of Indo-European, using Bayesian phylogenetic methods applied to an extensive new dataset of core vocabulary across 161 Indo-European languages.
2023-07-27_21-58-41.png


Screenshot 2023-07-27 at 10.09.33 PM.png


CONCLUSION​

Our results are not entirely consistent with either the Steppe hypothesis or the farming hypothesis. Recent aDNA evidence suggests that the Anatolian branch cannot be sourced to the steppe but rather to south of the Caucasus. For other branches, potential candidate expansion(s) out of the Yamnaya culture are detectable in aDNA, but some had only limited genetic impact. Our results reveal that these expansions from ~5000 yr B.P. onward also came too late for the language chronology of Indo-European divergence. They are consistent, however, with an ultimate homeland south of the Caucasus and a subsequent branch northward onto the steppe, as a secondary homeland for some branches of Indo-European entering Europe with the later Corded Ware–associated expansions. Language phylogenetics and aDNA thus combine to suggest that the resolution to the 200-year-old Indo-European enigma lies in a hybrid of the farming and Steppe hypotheses.

2023-07-27_21-59-54.png
 

Attachments

  • 2023-07-27_21-59-54.png
    2023-07-27_21-59-54.png
    53.6 KB · Views: 48
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes BWV and DennisN
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Although some one should cite the author for chart abuse, there has to be a much clearer way to present that data, but if I read it right, the Yamnaya - a common candidate for the original PIE speakers, could be a primary source of European languages but the chronology does not work for Sanskrit and other Asian IE languages?
 

1. What is the new hybrid model for the origin of Indo-European languages?

The new hybrid model for the origin of Indo-European languages proposes that the Indo-European language family emerged through a combination of both migration and cultural diffusion. This means that while some languages spread through the movement of people, others were adopted and adapted by neighboring cultures through cultural exchange and contact.

2. How is the new hybrid model different from previous theories?

The new hybrid model differs from previous theories in that it acknowledges the role of both migration and cultural diffusion in the spread and development of Indo-European languages. Previous theories often focused solely on either migration or diffusion, but the new model recognizes the interconnectedness of these processes.

3. What evidence supports the new hybrid model?

There is a growing body of linguistic and archaeological evidence that supports the new hybrid model. For example, studies have shown that there are similarities between languages that cannot be explained by migration alone and must have been the result of cultural diffusion. Additionally, archaeological evidence such as the spread of certain cultural practices and technologies also supports the idea of cultural exchange and diffusion.

4. How does the new hybrid model impact our understanding of human history?

The new hybrid model challenges traditional views of human history, which often portray cultures and languages as isolated and distinct from one another. Instead, it suggests that there has been a constant exchange and blending of cultures and languages throughout history. This has significant implications for our understanding of human migration, cultural development, and the formation of societies.

5. What are the potential implications of the new hybrid model?

The new hybrid model has the potential to reshape our understanding of language and cultural evolution. It may also lead to a more nuanced and inclusive perspective on the diversity of human cultures and languages, as well as the connections between them. Additionally, the model may have practical applications in fields such as language revitalization and preservation of cultural heritage.

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top