Non-Tenure/Teaching-only Academic Positions

  • Thread starter Mike K
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Academic
In summary, there is a misconception that faculty positions at liberal arts colleges are less competitive or prestigious than those at research institutions. However, this is not true as these colleges often have high rankings and rigorous tenure processes. Additionally, faculty members at liberal arts colleges are expected to engage in research work. Community colleges may have more non-tenure track positions available due to their heavy reliance on part-time instructors, but the overall trend is towards fewer tenure-track positions in all fields. The rise of the "gig economy" has also led to an increase in temporary and consulting positions for professionals, including faculty members.
  • #1
Mike K
24
1
I understand tenure track academic professorships are extremely competitive. However, are there any academic positions that are more avaliable?

I was thinking of professors at liberal arts colleges, professors who only teach and do not research, or other types of college lecturers (or something else I haven't considered).

For any such career, what is it like (job stability/permanence, etc.)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think you have a bit of a confusion here.

First, let me correct the impression that a faculty position at a "liberal arts college" is something that is easier and less "prestigious" than a faculty position at a research institution. If you have seen some of the rankings done in the US, some of the most competitive (and most expensive) universities to get into includes many liberal arts colleges (eg: Williams College in Mass). These schools do not skimp on the quality of the faculty members, and they are as good as any faculty members from other bigger-name institutions.

Secondly, just because a school is a liberal arts institution, it doesn't mean that the faculty members do not engage in research work in the sciences. While there often is a bigger emphasis on academic instructions due to the nature of smaller, more personal approach to education, these faculty members are, in many instances, expected to carry on research work, often involving their students.

Thirdly, liberal arts college faculty members go through the same rigorous tenure process like any other big institutions.

So, do not lump liberal arts college faulty members with non-tenure track faculty They are no different than faculty members at any other major institutions, and a position at such an institution can be as competitive as any!

Zz.
 
  • #3
ZapperZ said:
I think you have a bit of a confusion here.

First, let me correct the impression that a faculty position at a "liberal arts college" is something that is easier and less "prestigious" than a faculty position at a research institution. If you have seen some of the rankings done in the US, some of the most competitive (and most expensive) universities to get into includes many liberal arts colleges (eg: Williams College in Mass). These schools do not skimp on the quality of the faculty members, and they are as good as any faculty members from other bigger-name institutions.

Secondly, just because a school is a liberal arts institution, it doesn't mean that the faculty members do not engage in research work in the sciences. While there often is a bigger emphasis on academic instructions due to the nature of smaller, more personal approach to education, these faculty members are, in many instances, expected to carry on research work, often involving their students.

Thirdly, liberal arts college faculty members go through the same rigorous tenure process like any other big institutions.

So, do not lump liberal arts college faulty members with non-tenure track faculty They are no different than faculty members at any other major institutions, and a position at such an institution can be as competitive as any!

Zz.

I appologize! I did not mean to offend. I was curious about positions that are more open than professorships. It is good to know that positions at liberal art institutions are just as compeitive, so thank you!

To other repliers, to be clear: I do not mean to degrade such professions, or imply they are less prestigious.

I merely mean to ask what professions are more acheivable. If such positions still research, all the better.

EDIT: Also, ZapperZ, perhaps I meant to say less know or community colleges, which, while valuable institutions, are easier to become a faculty member at (perhaps? Well, that is what I'm trying to figure out). In any case, I'm not trying to be specific - any academic position that isn't impossible to get into.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Mike K said:
EDIT: Also, ZapperZ, perhaps I meant to say less know or community colleges, which, while valuable institutions, are easier to become a faculty member at (perhaps? Well, that is what I'm trying to figure out). In any case, I'm not trying to be specific - any academic position that isn't impossible to get into.
I taught math (primarily) in a community college between 1979 and 1997, and participated in many hiring committees for tenure-track positions. As time went on, the competition became heavier and heavier, with as many as 150 applications for a single position. Some of these applications didn't meet our minimum qualifications, so we might eliminate 30 to 40, and then still need to winnow the remainder down to the top 10 or 12 to interview.

A lot of schools hire for non-tenure track positions a quarter or semester at a time, and these tend to be not quite so competitive.
 
  • #5
The American Association of University Professors has published a report siting only 42% of University teaching positions are tenure track. It also notes that community colleges depend heavily on non tenured teaching position with part time positions making up more than 50% with many community colleges having no tenured positions except perhaps for department or program directors.http://www.aaup.org/report/status-non-tenure-track-faculty
 
  • #6
Note that that report is from 1993, although I would be very surprised of the % of tenure-track positions has increased since then.

Also note that there may be significant differences between fields, e.g. on the one hand English and math which have huge numbers of students in introductory classes, and on the other hand fields like physics which don't have as many such students and classes.
 
  • #7
jtbell said:
lthough I would be very surprised of the % of tenure-track positions has increased since then.

As I. Particularly since 2008 when the great recession started there has be a significant shift to what is know a the "Gig Economy" . More and more professionals are excepting temporary employment or Gigs aka consulting. Full time employees are usually the single greatest expense that an organization has so from a business prospective it is reasonable to reduce that number. I vaguely recall a report recently that the number of tenured positions is now around 30%.. However in a more recent AAUP report the following is commented

To provide some perspective, in 1975, full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty composed 45.10 percent of the total instructional faculty. Today, only 20.35 percent of instructional faculty are full time and tenure track. The combined proportion of full-time tenured (19.51 percent) and full-time tenure-track (7.37 percent) faculty together does not match that of the full-time tenured instructional faculty (29 percent) of four decades ago. In their place is an army of part-time instructional staff and graduate teaching assistants.

http://www.aaup.org/reports-publications/2014-15salarysurvey

While this does not single out anyone discipline I would expect a similar situation for physics.
 

1. What is a non-tenure/teaching-only academic position?

A non-tenure/teaching-only academic position is a faculty position at a university or college that does not require the employee to conduct research or publish academic articles. These positions focus solely on teaching and other educational responsibilities.

2. How does a non-tenure/teaching-only position differ from a tenure-track position?

A tenure-track position typically requires faculty members to conduct research and publish academic articles in addition to teaching. They also have the opportunity to earn tenure, which provides job security and academic freedom. In contrast, non-tenure/teaching-only positions do not have a research or tenure requirement.

3. What are the benefits of a non-tenure/teaching-only academic position?

One of the main benefits of a non-tenure/teaching-only position is the focus on teaching and student interaction. These positions often have lighter research and administrative responsibilities, allowing for more time and energy to be dedicated to teaching. They also provide a stable and secure job with opportunities for professional development and advancement.

4. What qualifications are necessary for a non-tenure/teaching-only academic position?

The specific qualifications may vary depending on the institution, but typically a non-tenure/teaching-only position requires a graduate degree in the relevant field, teaching experience, and a passion for education. Some institutions may also require teaching certifications or evidence of teaching excellence.

5. Are non-tenure/teaching-only positions only available at certain types of institutions?

No, non-tenure/teaching-only positions can be found at various types of institutions, including community colleges, liberal arts colleges, and large research universities. The availability of these positions may vary depending on the institution's size, budget, and specific needs.

Similar threads

  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
10
Views
764
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Career Guidance
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top