Perpetual motion and Newton's first law

In summary, the concept of perpetual motion is not possible, whether theoretically or practically. This is due to the laws of thermodynamics, specifically the conservation of energy and the presence of friction or resistance in any system. Any attempts to create a perpetual motion machine, whether for energy production or simply to perpetually move, will ultimately fail.
  • #1
physicsYum
8
0
This might be a very stupid question. But let me still ask. :)

Perpetual motion is not possible. But by Newton's first law, a body remains in its state of motion unless an external force acts on it.

Now, I wonder if the statement "perpetual motion is not possible" is true only in a practical context, or even theoretically? I remember reading one of the initial chapters on Feynman lectures, that to me, sounded like perpetual motion is not possible even in theory.

So assuming an ideal world of no friction, I roll a ball with some force. And then stop the force. It should keep moving at the same velocity, right? Isn't that perpetual motion?

I know I have some notion that is completely wrong. But can't figure out what. I appreciate any help in clarifying the same.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
  • #3
To clarify moving forever and perpetual motion machines (AKA free energy) are two different things. If you had a hypothetically infinite vacuum tunnel and pushed a ball down it it would travel indefinately. The moment you try to get any energy out of it though you will slow it down and eventually stop it.
 
  • #4
The "non-existance" of perpetual motion machines is not a consequence of Newton's laws but of the laws of thermodynamics.

The non-existance of "perpetual motion machines of the first kind", from which one can draw power, is a consequence of the first law of thermodynamics, the conservation of energy. The machine has only a finite amount of energy to begin with. If you are drawing energy out of it, eventually, it will have no more energy.

The non-existance of "perpetual motion machines of the second kind", from which one does NOT draw power, is a consequence of the second law of thermodynamics, the fact that there always exist friction or resistance so that even if we do not draw power, there is still a loss of energy resulting in the machiner eventually running out of energy.

You can consider the first to be a "theoretical" matter and the second "practical".
 
  • #5


Hello,

You are correct that perpetual motion is not possible, both in a practical and theoretical context. This is due to the fact that it would violate the laws of thermodynamics, specifically the first and second laws.

The first law, also known as the law of inertia, states that an object will remain at rest or in motion at a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. However, this law also applies to the concept of perpetual motion. In order for an object to continue moving perpetually, it would require a continuous external force to counteract the forces of friction and air resistance. Without this external force, the object would eventually slow down and come to a stop.

In an ideal world with no friction, the ball would indeed continue moving at a constant velocity after the initial force is removed. However, this is not considered perpetual motion as there is no external force continuously acting on the object. Without this external force, the ball would eventually come to a stop due to the effects of gravity and air resistance.

Furthermore, the second law of thermodynamics states that in any energy conversion, some energy will always be lost in the form of heat. This means that even in an ideal world with no friction, the ball would eventually lose some of its kinetic energy and come to a stop.

In summary, perpetual motion is not possible in either a practical or theoretical context due to the laws of thermodynamics and the concept of inertia. I hope this helps clarify any misconceptions you may have had. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to ask. Thank you.
 

Related to Perpetual motion and Newton's first law

1. What is perpetual motion?

Perpetual motion refers to the hypothetical concept of a machine that can continue to operate indefinitely without any external energy source.

2. Is perpetual motion possible according to Newton's first law?

No, perpetual motion is not possible according to Newton's first law of motion, also known as the law of inertia. This law states that an object at rest or in motion will remain in that state unless acted upon by an external force. Without an external force, a perpetual motion machine would eventually slow down and stop.

3. What is Newton's first law of motion?

Newton's first law of motion states that an object will remain at rest or in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force.

4. How does Newton's first law apply to perpetual motion?

Newton's first law applies to perpetual motion by explaining why it is not possible. Without an external force, the motion of a perpetual motion machine would eventually come to a stop, as there is no energy source to sustain its motion.

5. Are there any real-life examples of perpetual motion?

No, there are no known real-life examples of perpetual motion. While there have been many attempts to create perpetual motion machines, none have been successful due to the laws of thermodynamics and physics.

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
963
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
681
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
795
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
971
Back
Top