Pressure at a certain depth when density varies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating pressure at a certain depth when density varies, using the equations dp/dz = -ρg and p = ρgh. A participant calculated the density at 3m depth as 1060 kg/m³ but found their pressure result of 31195.8 Pa to be slightly off. The conversation emphasizes the need to sum pressure contributions from thin layers stacked from the surface to the desired depth, suggesting the use of integration. It is noted that the integration variable must be correctly related to depth, and attention should be paid to the direction of integration to ensure proper sign usage. The participants clarify the mathematical approach needed to accurately solve the problem.
pressurised
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


59fyFj4.png


Homework Equations


dp/dz=-ρg
p=ρgh

The Attempt at a Solution


I've found the density at depth 3m using ρ=ρ0+kh, which gave me 1060kgm-3. I then put this value into ρgh to get 31195.8Pa which seems to be ≈+1000 off the answer.

What is the correct mathematical way of solving this as I am not quite sure how to form the equation for variation of pressure using that.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of summing the pressure contributions from thin layers stacked one on top of the next from the surface down to the desired depth. Does that remind you of anything?
 
gneill said:
Think of summing the pressure contributions from thin layers stacked one on top of the next from the surface down to the desired depth. Does that remind you of anything?

I can't quite think of the name of it but I understand what you mean:sorry:.

I would have thought ∫-(ρ0+kh)g dz would have been okay to use?
 
pressurised said:
I would have thought ∫-(ρ0+kh)g dz would have been okay to use?
That's the idea. You'll need to relate the h to your integration variable z. You should pay attention to the "direction" that your integration path takes as it affects the sign of the dz differential element and hence whether that leading minus sign is warranted.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
gneill said:
That's the idea. You'll need to relate the h to your integration variable z. You should pay attention to the "direction" that your integration path takes as it affects the sign of the dz differential element and hence whether that leading minus sign is warranted.

Thank you!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.
Back
Top