MHB Probability of Spin Resulting in Even # or <4

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability of a spin resulting in an even number or a number less than 4. The initial calculation yielded results of 3/4 or 6/8, using union set operations for the probabilities of 4/8 and 3/8. Participants agree that the correct answer is 3/4, which is not included in the provided answer choices. The conversation highlights a potential oversight in the options given. Overall, the consensus points to 3/4 as the accurate probability.
MIIF
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I tried to answer it and got 3/4 or 6/8 after using the union set operation for 4/8 or 1/2 and 3/8, based on what is being asked in the problem. https://www.mathplanet.com/education...lity-of-eventshttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180329/39d5da5505f3c8ccaa27619bfbfd516c.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20180329/3cd8ecb6e781e932cdcc6cdba59ea7b5.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
MIIF said:
I tried to answer it and got 3/4 or 6/8 after using the union set operation for 4/8 or 1/2 and 3/8, based on what is being asked in the problem. https://www.mathplanet.com/education...lity-of-events
Hi MIIF, and welcome to MHB!

I agree with you. The answer should be 3/4, which is not listed among the choices A.-D.
 
Opalg said:
Hi MIIF, and welcome to MHB!

I agree with you. The answer should be 3/4, which is not listed among the choices A.-D.
Thanks!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top