Project Orion again - why not interstellar probe?

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of sending a probe to a distant star system using Project Orion, a spacecraft powered by nuclear bombs. There are technical and political challenges to this mission, and it raises the question of whether the cost and risks are worth the potential data that could be gathered. Additionally, there is discussion about the feasibility of powering the spacecraft for a long journey and the potential impact of fallout from the nuclear bombs. The conversation also considers the potential limitations of studying distant planets with telescopes and the potential for new discoveries with probes.
  • #1
Tiger Blood
50
11
I was watching recently that PBS Space Video on youtube about space propulsion and it got me thinking about Project Orion again.


They talk about sending humans to another star system, but would it not be spectacular enough to send probe? The probe could scan and photograph planets there and maybe we could learn lots of stuff or are telescopes enough? This spaceship could bring with it lots of equipment since it can be massive.

They say how it would take 90 years to arrive to closest star, but that's with people in it, maybe the probe doesn't need to brake but use all the nukes to speed up, then it would be there in 45 years and we would get data sooner if it had some nice telescopes to look ahead. Maybe it could even launch smaller probes to orbit those planets but then it would be the problem of communication since they would have to transmit data to Orion first and if it's not stooping there wouldn't be much time.
But maybe since it doesn't carry people it could accelerate faster, meaning that it could use bigger and fewer bombs and therefore have enough to stop?

When it comes to fallout the Orion could be launched over the North Pole where the field lines go straight out, and use very unsymmetrical bombs so you can be sure the debris is going outwards and not inwards. To soften this even further neutron bombs could be used since they produce neutrons without fission, and neutrons you could easily absorb. That would have meant killing one person per mission - but is that acceptable that someone must die?

Of course the question of politics and "do we really need this?" Could NASA, ESA and China work together in making this? Would this be a good idea? Would it not bring precious data?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Tiger Blood said:
They say how it would take 90 years to arrive to closest star, but that's with people in it, maybe the probe doesn't need to brake but use all the nukes to speed up, then it would be there in 45 years
The time would not half.
Tiger Blood said:
and we would get data sooner if it had some nice telescopes to look ahead.
It is quite pointless to gather data from more than a light month away (~1 year before the fly-by) - telescopes on Earth would easily get a better resolution as their distance is just ~50 times larger.
Tiger Blood said:
When it comes to fallout the Orion could be launched over the North Pole where the field lines go straight out, and use very unsymmetrical bombs so you can be sure the debris is going outwards and not inwards.
Momentum conservation - spacecraft goes up, bomb material has to go down. The magnetic field lines don't matter, wind will transport the debris around.

There are various technical challenges of such a mission - the Wikipedia article has a long list. The political challenges are massive as well. And there is also the Wait calculation: sending a faster spacecraft later could give you the data faster. Or just wait for a few more decades of telescope development on Earth.

It is probably not impossible, but it would need a huge amount of money, political problems, radiation problems, and (even if it works) just produce a few images in the distant future.
 
  • #3
mfb said:
It is quite pointless to gather data from more than a light month away (~1 year before the fly-by) - telescopes on Earth would easily get a better resolution as their distance is just ~50 times larger.

And that is the key question. If you are going to spend a trillion dollars on this effort, what are you going to learn? And could you learn more by doing this some other way?
 
  • #4
What about electricity on board? Let's say someone decides to make it how would you power computers on it for 50 years or even hundred?
 
  • #5
I did a little research and it seems Traveling wave reactor (TWR) could be used to harness electricity. TWR design is good to go without refueling for about 60+ years, so you would have to bring back-ups if you wanted more time.

mfb said:
Momentum conservation - spacecraft goes up, bomb material has to go down. The magnetic field lines don't matter, wind will transport the debris around.
Well the calculation already reefers to the scenario if all debris were spread around the world. I was also reading on Wikipedia about how relatively clean PNEs (Peaceful nuclear explosions) could be used, they are bombs that yield 98% fusion and have been tested by US and former USSR in 1970s, so maybe it could be cleaner.
Vanadium 50 said:
And that is the key question. If you are going to spend a trillion dollars on this effort, what are you going to learn? And could you learn more by doing this some other way?
OK let's tackle the learning part. I'm not quite sure how good the future telescopes will be, but I still think that closer look always yields more knowledge. I mean just look what spectacular knowledge we got from probes in our own sol in just past few years. Like that Ceres and Vespa seem to have steam coming from them. Or that Pluto does not have as much craters as it was expected and even seems to have pools of liquids - on some "little boring rock". Or look few decades ago when it was thought that all moons in solar system will be same "boring" moons like ours until probes scanned them. Now, of course, we have telescopes that we can see geysers Enceladus, but will the future telescopes give us something even close to that when it comes to extra-solar planets? Because I also think that for every extra-solar planet that we discover we have only the knowledge of our own planets to compare to. I mean if the probe comes there and discovers nothing more unusual in those extra-solar planets then we expected, then fine, we win again because we're as smart as we thought and let's face it many many times in the history of humans we fell into the trap of thinking that we already got figured out how things work in the universe.
Even the journey itself can teach us a lot. Remember when Pioneer was leaving sol there was this unexpected anomaly or Pioneer effect, so just going there would be gaining knowledge.

But of course the price. Now it seems there wasn't any serous study of how much this would cost and I think there should be at least a cost study. From what I can see in wikipedia article it doesn't look that it would be THAT expensive. I'm more inclined to believe maybe between 100 billion to 200 billion USD spread over something like 30 years and it certainly would have to be done internationally by US, EU, Russa and China and they have the money to pay, but of course it would be hard to convince people. Of course I could mention some much more expensive stuff that are currently going on that not only have no purpose but are also harmful, but would that matter?
You could probably much easier talk China, Russia and EU into this project then United States. US would probably be the hardest one, but also the crucial.
 
  • #6
OK I think this is my last entry in this. Let's leave the political talk and what matters here is motivation. Because motivation can do wonders. What can be a motivation that will capture people's imagination?
My guess one day when Earth-like planet is spied with the telescope and if it's somewhere in the vicinity of 20 ly then people will be eager to build this probe and send to that planet to see if it's still in dinosaur era or humanoid era. Especially after few more years of Star Wars movies. Can you imagine the spaceship coming to the planet and discovering alien dinosaurs and then malfunctioning and falling down destroying alien dinosaurs?
 
  • #7
Tiger Blood said:
Can you imagine the spaceship coming to the planet and discovering alien dinosaurs and then malfunctioning and falling down destroying alien dinosaurs?
or landing/crashing into an alien city (appearing as a bomb, so to speak). While we don't learn of this catastrophe for twenty years or so, they immediately mobilize to finish the WAR that we started! That is something to ponder.
.
Or even just a likely, we inadvertently contact a fierce and hostile bunch who has a 20 year head start to prepare for a war we don't even realize we are in.
 
  • #8
Any civilization that can spot a probe randomly flying through their planetary system, or identify the artificial nature of an (extremely unlikely) impact, can easily find Earth and probably detect signs of intelligent life there.
 
  • #9
t was my failed attempt to make a joke, associating it with our dinosaur period because as a child I remember reading a book on dinosaurs and in a text why they all died out was mentioned how there were bucketful of theories including one where Martians killed them. Of course if Orion came to another star system it would be empty of bombs by then.
I also imagine Orion-like probe would consist of let's say dozen probes and it could launch and leave like one probe in the now mysterious Oort cloud, not to mention Orion would be the first to visit it and actually prove visually it's there and then entering other star's Oort cloud. It would be such an exciting wold to live in.
 

1. What is Project Orion and why was it not used for an interstellar probe?

Project Orion was a proposed spacecraft propulsion system that used nuclear pulse propulsion. It was intended to launch large payloads into Earth orbit and beyond, but it was ultimately not used for an interstellar probe due to concerns about nuclear fallout and political opposition to nuclear testing in space.

2. What would have been the benefits of using Project Orion for an interstellar probe?

The main benefit of using Project Orion for an interstellar probe would have been its ability to reach very high speeds, potentially up to 10% of the speed of light. This would allow the probe to reach other star systems in a reasonable amount of time, making it a more feasible option for interstellar exploration.

3. What were the major challenges in developing a Project Orion interstellar probe?

One of the major challenges in developing a Project Orion interstellar probe was ensuring the safety of the crew and the surrounding environment during nuclear propulsion testing. There were also concerns about the reliability of the propulsion system and the potential for malfunctions during a long-distance journey.

4. Could Project Orion be used for interstellar travel in the future?

While Project Orion was never used for interstellar travel, it is still a concept that is being explored by scientists and engineers. With advancements in technology and safety measures, it is possible that a modified version of Project Orion could be used for interstellar travel in the future.

5. What other propulsion systems are being considered for interstellar travel?

There are several propulsion systems being considered for interstellar travel, including solar sails, ion thrusters, and antimatter propulsion. These systems have their own advantages and challenges, and ongoing research and development is being done to determine the best option for interstellar travel.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
670
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
3
Views
160
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
677
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
Back
Top