Proton-Boron fusion feasibility

  • Thread starter Melbourne Guy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Fusion
In summary, a recent conversation discussed the potential of proton-boron fusion and the feasibility of a backpack-sized fusion device capable of generating 5kWe. The proposed design by Avalanche Energy has not been built yet, and their website focuses more on rapid prototyping than the physics behind their idea. The concept of p+B11 fusion was also discussed, with an optimum ion temperature range of 200-400 keV and the importance of ash control for achieving a high Q value. A graduate thesis from a Lockheed Martin researcher provided the seed for Avalanche Energy's technology, which uses a modified Knight trap as the core of the reactor and ion guns to fire deuterium ions. The team has successfully generated energy in the form of high-speed neutrons
  • #1
Melbourne Guy
462
315
TL;DR Summary
I've seen HB11 previously and Avalanche Energy more recently pronounce proton-boron fusion as the alternative to current designs and was wondering if it is feasible?
A PF search results in some discussion of proton-boron fusion, and from those posts, it seems that cross-section issues limit the likelihood of this type of fusion device. Now, Avalanche Energy (https://www.avalanche.energy/index.html) is claiming a design that is backpack sized and capable of generating 5kWe. Note, they have not built anything and their website focuses more on rapid prototyping than the physics the underpin their idea.

Quite apart from my surprised for fusion that does not occur at Sun-like temperatures and pressures, I can't figure out how they generate electricity with their design.

Any thoughts on the feasibility of this concept.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have trouble accessing the site.

Some basics on p+B11 fusion from Tri Alpha Energy (TAE): https://www.physics.uci.edu/sites/p...P20-FRC-reactor-Rostoker-08-18-2015-final.pdf

Optimum ion temperature is in the range 200-400 keV [which is about 2.3E9 to 4.6E9 K]

Without ash control: CHe ~ 70-80% resulting in a very low Q
It takes about 100 s to build up ash
High Q requires very efficient ash control
Required ash concentration < 5%

Slide 27 gives some idea of energy conversion.
80% of fusion energy goes to the side wall in form of x-rays (~150keV). Converted in electricity by a thermal cycle (50% efficiency)
Normally, the X-rays or Bremsstrahlung radiation would be considered energy losses (which they are from the plasma), but they produce thermal energy (heat) which could be transferred to a typical thermodynamic cycle to convert to mechanical energy (turbine, or thermoelectric), but that means an inefficient conversion process.
Convective energy loss into expanders (20% of fusion power) can be converted electrostatically in expanders
I believe they imply 'direct conversion' in which positive ions and electrons are separated, and the electrons flow through the a conductor producing DC.

Apparently, a couple of veterans from Blue Origin created the company.
https://www.geekwire.com/2022/blue-...lution-to-massive-challenge-of-fusion-energy/
As Avalanche Energy founders https://www.linkedin.com/in/robin-langtry-94899195/ and https://www.linkedin.com/in/brian-riordan-a7883b11/ have been grinding through the development of their fusion technology, they keep expecting to hit a wall.

The team is taking a less conventional approach to fusion energy, building a small-scale solution and foregoing the outrageous temperatures and ultra powerful magnets required by other systems. The simpler, seemingly elegant approach has left them wondering if it’s possible that no one else has developed or patented the design — or done the research showing it won’t work.

The wall, so far, has not materialized. But positive developments have. The startup has raised a $5 million seed round, secured a Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) International Patent, and recently emerged from stealth mode. A few weeks ago, Langtry and Riordan generated their first neutrons via fusion.
Later in the article
While researching the field, Langtry came across a graduate thesis from a Lockheed Martin researcher named https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-mcguire-b644ab82/. It included open source code for simulations for an electrostatic fusion reactor. The idea became the seed for Avalanche Energy’s technology.

A strategy for fusion​

The startup is building its fusion generator prototype out of a mix of off-the-shelf and custom-made parts.

They’re using a modified Knight trap, a type of orbiting ion trap, as the core of the reactor and electrostatic source for high-energy, ion confinement over long periods of time. They created ion guns to fire deuterium ions — a heavy form of hydrogen — into the ion trap. A high voltage generator creates conditions in the reactor that produce the plasma in which the ions can orbit, collide, fuse and release energy.

The team has generated energy in the form of high speed neutrons, and will be adding magnets to the system to create a higher density reactor that produces more energy. They also need to set up the means for transforming the heat energy that’s produced into electrical energy.
Sound likes Avalanche Energy is considering the same approach as TAE.

One other point mentioned in the TAE presentation regards neutron production. The p-B11 is considered aneutronic, which it is, however, the product of the reaction, 3α, or the ash introduces the potential for a side reaction, α + 11B => 14N + n, which is the source of neutrons in the system. Hence, the need to minimize the ash or concentration of α in the plasma.

Edit/update: Dr. Nat Fisch, a professor of astrophysical sciences at Princeton University, is the principal investigator of a new project looking at p+B11 fusion.
https://www.princeton.edu/news/2022...ng-unlikely-fantastic-clean-energy-technology
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thanks @Astronuc, I had hoped for an informed response, but yours is above and beyond 🙏
 

1. What is proton-boron fusion?

Proton-boron fusion is a type of nuclear fusion reaction that involves the fusion of protons (hydrogen nuclei) with boron atoms to form a helium nucleus and release energy.

2. Is proton-boron fusion feasible?

Currently, proton-boron fusion is not considered feasible for commercial energy production due to the high temperatures and pressures required to initiate the reaction. However, research and development efforts are ongoing to improve the feasibility of this process.

3. How does proton-boron fusion compare to other fusion reactions?

Proton-boron fusion has several advantages over other fusion reactions, including the absence of radioactive waste and the use of abundant and non-toxic fuels. However, it also has a higher temperature and pressure requirement, making it more challenging to achieve.

4. What are the potential applications of proton-boron fusion?

If successfully developed, proton-boron fusion could have a wide range of applications, including energy production, space propulsion, and medical isotope production. It could also potentially be used as a clean and sustainable source of energy for long-term space missions.

5. What are the current challenges in achieving proton-boron fusion?

The main challenges in achieving proton-boron fusion include creating and maintaining the extreme temperatures and pressures required for the reaction to occur, as well as finding ways to efficiently capture and utilize the energy released. Additionally, the development of advanced technologies and materials to contain and control the reaction is also a significant challenge.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
14K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
815
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
734
Back
Top