Proving Division of Local Ring in Ring with Idempotents

In summary, the conversation discusses a ring R with two idempotent elements e and f=1-e, and R is a direct sum of two subrings R1 and R2. If R1={0,e} and R2 is a local ring, it is proven that R2 is a division ring. The conversation also explores the properties of e and f, and the conditions under which R2 is a division ring.
  • #1
xixi
21
0
Let [itex]R[/itex] be a ring . Suppose that [itex]e[/itex] and [itex]f=1-e[/itex] are two idempotent elements of [itex]R[/itex] and we have [itex]R=eRe \oplus fRf[/itex] (direct sum ) and [itex]R[/itex] doesn't have any non-trivial nilpotent element . Set [itex]R_1=eRe[/itex] and [itex]R_2=fRf[/itex] . If [itex]R_1=\{0,e\}[/itex] and [itex]R_2[/itex] is a local ring , then prove that [itex]R_2[/itex] is a division ring . (note that [itex]e[/itex] and [itex]f[/itex] are central idempotents and therefore [itex]fRf=fR[/itex] )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I.) ##ef=e(1-e)=e-e^2=e-e=0## and ##fe=(1-e)e=e-e^2=e-e=0##

II.) With ##R=\{\,0,e\,\}\oplus fRf## we have for elements ##p=frf## by (I) that ##ep=0=pe## and for elements ##p=e+frf## we get ##ep=e^2+efrf=e^2=e=(e+frf)e=pe##, hence ##e \in R## is central. But ##fr=(1-e)r=r-er=r-re=r(1-e)=rf## so ##f\in R## is also central. Thus ##R=\{\,0,e\,\}\oplus fR##.

III.) If ##f## is no unit in ##R_2## then ##1-f=e \in R_2## is a unit by locality. Now ##e\in R## is also a unit, but ##ef=0##. So ##f=0## and ##e=1##.
If ##f## is a unit, then by ##ef=0## we get ##e=0## and ##f=1##.
Thus the only possibilities are ##(e,f)\in\{\,(1,0)\, , \,(0,1)\,\}##.

IV.) If ##f=0##, then ##R=R_1\oplus R_2=\{\,0,1\,\}\oplus \{\,0\,\} = \mathbb{Z}_2## is a field, and ##R_2=\{\,0\,\}##. Hence we have ##f=1## and ##e=0##, i.e. ##R=R_1\oplus R_2=\{\,0\,\}\oplus R_2=R_2##.
The nilradical of ##R## is zero, so the intersection of all prime ideals of ##R## is zero.
The Jacobson radical ##J(R)##, the intersection of all maximal ideals of ##R##, is zero if ##R## is a division ring. For a local ring ##R## we have that ##R/J(R)## is a division ring. So all comes down to show that ##J(R)=\{\,0\,\}##.

However, as I see it, this needs additional information which we do not have, e.g. ##R## could be left-Artinian.
 

Related to Proving Division of Local Ring in Ring with Idempotents

1. What is the definition of a local ring?

A local ring is a commutative ring with a unique maximal ideal, meaning that every proper ideal is contained within the maximal ideal.

2. How is the division of local ring proved in a ring with idempotents?

The division of local ring is proved using the Nakayama's lemma, which states that if M is a finitely generated module over a commutative ring R with identity, and I is an ideal of R contained in the Jacobson radical of R, then M=IM implies M=0.

3. What are idempotents in a ring?

Idempotents are elements in a ring that, when multiplied by themselves, result in the same element. In other words, they are self-inverse elements in a ring.

4. How do idempotents affect the division of local ring?

In a ring with idempotents, the division of local ring can be simplified by considering the idempotent elements as a partition of the ring. This allows for a more efficient and systematic approach to proving the division of local ring.

5. What is the significance of proving division of local ring in a ring with idempotents?

Proving division of local ring in a ring with idempotents is important in abstract algebra as it allows for the study of more general rings with additional algebraic structures. It also has applications in various fields such as algebraic geometry, algebraic number theory, and representation theory.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top