Relativity of Length: Understanding Length Contraction & Time Dilation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Rios
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Relativity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concepts of length contraction and time dilation in the context of a particle moving at relativistic speeds. It highlights the confusion surrounding the calculations of proper length (L_0) and proper time (delta_t_0) as perceived from different frames of reference. The calculations reveal that the length measured in the particle's frame is indeed less than that measured from the Earth's frame, aligning with the principles of relativity. Additionally, it emphasizes that in the particle's rest frame, the Earth moves, not the particle itself, which clarifies the misunderstanding regarding the motion in different frames. Overall, the conversation reinforces the importance of correctly applying relativistic equations to avoid misconceptions.
Fernando Rios
Messages
96
Reaction score
10
Homework Statement
An unstable particle is created in the upper atmosphere from
a cosmic ray and travels straight down toward the surface of the
earth with a speed of relative to the earth. A scientist at
rest on the earth’s surface measures that the particle is created at an
altitude of a) As measured by the scientist, how much
time does it take the particle to travel the to the surface of
the earth? b) Use the length contraction formula to calculate the distance
from where the particle is created to the surface of the earth as
measured in the particle’s frame. c) In the particle’s frame, how
much time does it take the particle to travel from where it is created
to the surface of the earth? Calculate this time both by the time dilation
formula and also from the distance calculated in part (b). Do
the two results agree?
Relevant Equations
delta_t = delta_t_0/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

delta_L = L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
a) We use the definition of speed:
v = delta_L/delta_t

delta_t = delta_L/v = 45000 m/(0.99540*3*10^8 m/s) = 1.55*10^-4 s

b) We use the length contraction equation:
delta_L = L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

L_0 = delta_L/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 45000 m/sqrt(1-0.99540^2) = 469698 m

However, the solution shows the following:
L_0 = delta_L*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 45000 m*sqrt(1-0.99540^2) = 4310 m

Shouldn't the length in the particle's frame be greater?

c) We use the time dilation equation:
delta_t = delta_t_0/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

delta_t_0 = delta_t*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = (1.51*10^-4 s)*sqrt(1-0.99540^2) = 1.44*10^-5 s

We use the definition of velocity:
v = L_0/delta_t_0

delta_t_0 = L_0/v = 469698 m/(0.99540*3*10^8 m/s) = 1.51*10^-4 s

However, the solution shows the following:
delta_t_0 = L_0/v = 4310 m/(0.99540*3*10^8 m/s) = 1.44*10^-4 s

What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fernando Rios said:
a) We use the definition of speed:
v = delta_L/delta_t
t= L_0 / v
because distance is still at the Earth. I read ##L_0=45,000 \ m##
Fernando Rios said:
b) We use the length contraction equation:
delta_L = L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

L_0 = delta_L/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) = 45000 m/sqrt(1-0.99540^2) = 469698 m
L is distance measured in particle frame of reference
L=L_0 \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}=\frac{L_0}{ \gamma}
I read ##v=0.9954c,\ \gamma=10.44##

I will leave the followings to you.
 
Fernando Rios said:
Homework Statement:: An unstable particle is created in the upper atmosphere from
a cosmic ray and travels straight down toward the surface of the
earth with a speed of relative to the earth. A scientist at
rest on the earth’s surface measures that the particle is created at an
altitude of a) As measured by the scientist, how much
time does it take the particle to travel the to the surface of
the earth? b) Use the length contraction formula to calculate the distance
from where the particle is created to the surface of the Earth as
measured in the particle’s frame. c) In the particle’s frame, how
much time does it take the particle to travel from where it is created
to the surface of the earth? Calculate this time both by the time dilation
formula and also from the distance calculated in part (b). Do
the two results agree?
Relevant Equations:: delta_t = delta_t_0/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

delta_L = L_0*sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)

Shouldn't the length in the particle's frame be greater?
No. The rest frame of the distance is the Earth’s rest frame. It is therefore contracted in the particle’s rest frame.

Also note that part (c) of the statement is badly formulated.
”In the particle’s frame, how much time does it take the particle to travel”
The particle is at rest in its rest frame and therefore does not travel in that frame by definition. In that frame, it is the Earth’s surface that travels.
 
Thank you for your answer. It really helped me.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top