Requesting constructive criticism for my paper

  • #36
After taking in all your feedback, I submitted a new version of my paper, where instead the main result is called the simple result and is defined as a lemma, not a theorem. I also solved the "conjecture" in my paper and replaced it with a theorem, deriving an asymptotic for the roots of the Alternating Harmonic Numbers. I appreciate your feedback, it made a difference (for me at least)!

One small note, I wasn't able to cite Ramanujan because his Ramanujan summation appears in his notebooks, and I don't know how to cite them as they're unpublished. Hopefully mentioning his name in "Ramanujan Summation" should be enough to give him proper credit.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #37
I appreciate the little heads-up. Don't worry. I'm under no illusions that I can really contribute anything. All the best. :)
 
  • #38
sbrothy said:
I appreciate the little heads-up. Don't worry. I'm under no illusions that I can really contribute anything. All the best. :)
I think I can still cite his notebooks somehow. You have contributed something, don't downplay what you've done :)
 
  • Love
Likes sbrothy

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
506
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Aerospace Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
1
Views
929
  • STEM Academic Advising
3
Replies
82
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Back
Top