- #1
rrw4rusty
- 46
- 0
Hello,
I’m a sci-fi writer and I wish to gage the believability of (or lack of) the following which I’m using in a story.
Concerning the extensions to cosmology and quantum physics, one of the cornerstones of my book’s sci-fi universe stems from a strange and intriguing fact that I’ve ‘expanded’ on… (I checked with science forms in 2002 or 2003 and in the vast majority of replys was told that 'this fact' was true. If you disagree with the baseline premise--OK. You may still find this amusing.)
The properties of infinite density (a singularity) and those of an absolute vacuum (this means no vacuum energy, no virtual particles, absolutely nothing) are identical. Actually, neither have many properties to speak of but, if you try to break it down then:
A singularity (infinite density):
• Is completely uniform (that is, it is the same everywhere--it has but a single ‘state’)
• Has no events
• Has no time
• Has no temperature
• Has no volume
• Has no particles
• It is the absolute baseline of entropy
An absolute vacuum, if you'll review the above list, has the exact same properties. Therefore, in my sci-fi series at least, they are the same thing. And since the two are the same, both generate infinite gravity and it is not mass that creates gravitational attraction but rather that all mass is attracted to a lessor number states or, if you will, a return to entropy’s baseline.
The big bang threw us away from this and towards increasing entropy but all is still pulled towards it--this is gravity, the force that unsuccessfully fought against the big bang and now unsuccessfully fights against dark energy (my story explains this too but that’s another story).
In my story this singular state is called a unistate.
How can this be viewed? If you picture the face of a clock, and say that twelve o’clock is the unistate (i.e. the infinite density or the absolute vacuum) then one minute after twelve might be a neutron star (or a second after the big bang) and one minute to twelve might be just a low state of vacuum energy and virtual particles (one destiny of the accelerating expansion of our universe). Circumventing the clock (clockwise) could be the life of a universe.
If true, things change considerably. Dark matter might vanish (as it is does in my sci-fi) as the seemingly odd rotation of galaxies would simply be the balance of the gravity from all the matter in the central areas against the gravity from the lack of matter towards the outside (and beyond). Think about how a black hole is created: the explosion of a large star infinitely compresses some of its matter at its center or…the explosion sucks all of the matter out of its center (does it really matter which).
I could go on but, enough. Your thoughts, feedback and insights please.
Cheers,
Rusty Williamson
I’m a sci-fi writer and I wish to gage the believability of (or lack of) the following which I’m using in a story.
Concerning the extensions to cosmology and quantum physics, one of the cornerstones of my book’s sci-fi universe stems from a strange and intriguing fact that I’ve ‘expanded’ on… (I checked with science forms in 2002 or 2003 and in the vast majority of replys was told that 'this fact' was true. If you disagree with the baseline premise--OK. You may still find this amusing.)
The properties of infinite density (a singularity) and those of an absolute vacuum (this means no vacuum energy, no virtual particles, absolutely nothing) are identical. Actually, neither have many properties to speak of but, if you try to break it down then:
A singularity (infinite density):
• Is completely uniform (that is, it is the same everywhere--it has but a single ‘state’)
• Has no events
• Has no time
• Has no temperature
• Has no volume
• Has no particles
• It is the absolute baseline of entropy
An absolute vacuum, if you'll review the above list, has the exact same properties. Therefore, in my sci-fi series at least, they are the same thing. And since the two are the same, both generate infinite gravity and it is not mass that creates gravitational attraction but rather that all mass is attracted to a lessor number states or, if you will, a return to entropy’s baseline.
The big bang threw us away from this and towards increasing entropy but all is still pulled towards it--this is gravity, the force that unsuccessfully fought against the big bang and now unsuccessfully fights against dark energy (my story explains this too but that’s another story).
In my story this singular state is called a unistate.
How can this be viewed? If you picture the face of a clock, and say that twelve o’clock is the unistate (i.e. the infinite density or the absolute vacuum) then one minute after twelve might be a neutron star (or a second after the big bang) and one minute to twelve might be just a low state of vacuum energy and virtual particles (one destiny of the accelerating expansion of our universe). Circumventing the clock (clockwise) could be the life of a universe.
If true, things change considerably. Dark matter might vanish (as it is does in my sci-fi) as the seemingly odd rotation of galaxies would simply be the balance of the gravity from all the matter in the central areas against the gravity from the lack of matter towards the outside (and beyond). Think about how a black hole is created: the explosion of a large star infinitely compresses some of its matter at its center or…the explosion sucks all of the matter out of its center (does it really matter which).
I could go on but, enough. Your thoughts, feedback and insights please.
Cheers,
Rusty Williamson