MHB So the probability that at least one event occurs is 0.748.

  • Thread starter Thread starter schinb65
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Independent
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probability that at least one of two independent events occurs, with given probabilities of 0.1 and 0.3. The initial approach uses the formula P(a ∪ b) = P[a] + P[b] - P[a ∩ b], where P[a ∩ b] is determined by multiplying the probabilities of the independent events. An alternative method is presented, calculating the probability of neither event occurring and subtracting that from 1, leading to a final probability of 0.748 when a third event is included. Participants confirm the correctness of both methods, emphasizing that the second approach may be less intuitive initially. The discussion highlights different strategies for solving probability problems involving independent events.
schinb65
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Two independent events have probabilities 0.1 and 0.3. What is the probability that at least one of
the events occurs?


I have an answer of .37, when I looked up the solution it is the same value but it was solved another way. I was just wondering if my logic would work.

Find $P(a \cup b) = P[a] + P - P[a \cap b]$
So I have P[a] and P, and I can find $P[a \cap b]$ from independence I can say that;
$P[a \cap b]$ = P[a]*P, correct?

Or is the only way that I can solve it which is easier then my approach,
1-P[neither event]
1-P(1-a)*P(1-b)
But I do not feel that this would be the first way that would pop into my mind.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: independent event

Hello, schinb65!

Two independent events have probabilities 0.1 and 0.3.
What is the probability that at least one of the events occurs?


I have an answer of 0.37.
When I looked up the solution, it is the same value,
but it was solved another way.
I was just wondering if my logic would work.

Find $P(a \cup b) = P[a] + P - P[a \cap b]$
So I have $P[a]$ and $P$, and I can find $P[a \cap b]$.
From independence I can say that: $P[a \cap b] = P[a]\!\cdot\!P$
Correct? . Yes!

The other approach is:
$1-P[\text{neither event}] \:=\:1 - P(a')\!\cdot\! P(b')$

But I do not feel that this would be the first way
that would pop into my mind.

If there were more events,
. . I'm sure this method would occur to you.Given: .\begin{Bmatrix}P[a] = 0.1 \\ P<b> = 0.3 \\ P[c] = 0.6 \end{Bmatrix}</b>

Find the probability that at least one event occurs.P[a\cup b \cup c] \:=\:1 - P[\sim\!a]\!\cdot\!P[\sim\!b]\!\cdot\!P[\sim\!c]

. . . . . . . . . =\:1 - (0.9)(0.7)(0.4)

. . . . . . . . . =\:1 - 0.252

. . . . . . . . . =\:0.748
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top