Standard Reduction Potential Changes in Regards to Acidity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effect of pH on the standard reduction potential of the O2 to H2O reaction in acidic solutions. When the pH increases by one unit, the half-cell potential decreases due to the relationship outlined in the Nernst equation. Specifically, the reduction potential decreases by 59 mV for each unit increase in pH. Participants clarify that the activity of pure substances, such as water, is considered to be 1, which is crucial for applying the Nernst equation correctly. Understanding these concepts is essential for solving related electrochemical problems.
Teemo
Messages
44
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The reduction of O2 to H2O in acidic solution has a standard reduction potential of +1.23 V. What is the effect on the half-cell potential at 25 °C when the pH of the solution is increased by one unit?

O2(g) + 4H+(aq) + 4e- –> 2 H2O(l)

(A) The half-cell potential decreases by 59 mV.
(B) The half-cell potential increases by 59 mV.
(C) The half-cell potential decreases by 236 mV.
(D) The half-cell potential increases by 236 mV.

Homework Equations


Nernst Equation

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm aware this is a Nernst equation problem. Yet, I'm not exactly sure how to apply it. It appears to me that the reaction quotient would be 0, since there is only a pure liquid on the product side. As such, I am not sure how to approach the problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Teemo said:
quotient would be 0, since there is only a pure liquid on the product side

Activity of a pure substance is not zero.
 
Would it be 1? I feel like I'm missing something obvious o_O
 
Yes, it is 1. Just like activity of solids (think Ksp - it doesn't contain solid, as its activity is 1).
 
Thank you so much!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top