Stationary Waves: Equations for Standing Waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying which equations can form stationary waves, concluding that equations 1 and 2 (y=Asin(wt-kx) and y=Acos(wt-kx)) and equations 3 and 4 (y=Asin(wt+kx) and y=Acos(wt+kx)) can form standing waves. It clarifies that waves traveling in opposite directions are necessary for standing waves, emphasizing that equations 2 and 3 travel in the same direction, thus cannot form a standing wave. The conversation also touches on the importance of wave function consistency, noting that the form of the wave must remain the same to maintain its characteristics. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the significance of understanding wave direction and function in the formation of stationary waves.
Abhishekdas
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
Stationary waves...

Homework Statement


Which of the following equations can form stationary waves...
1. y=Asin(wt-kx)
2. y=Acos(wt-kx)
3. y=Asin(wt+kx)
4. y=Acos(wt+kx)



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Answer is 1,3 and 2,4 which is obviously correct...But why can't other combinations be possible as long as they are traveling in opposite directions (like 2 and 3)?
And you can standing waves be formed by waves of different amplitudes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


2 & 3 are traveling in the same direction :)
 


No... they are opposite... 2 is in the +ve x direction and 3 is in the -ve x direction...
 


Why do you think so? (your explanation)
Hint: The functions are not same...one is sine and the other is cosine :wink:
 


The direction of wave is determined by the sign of the quantity (coefficient of w/coefficient of x) it its is positive then the wave is traveling in -ve x direction and vice versa...That is my explanation...
 


Abhishekdas said:
the wave is traveling in -ve x direction and vice versa...

As long as the function defining wave remains the same!
You can write 2. y=cos(wt-kx) as y=sin(π/2-wt+kx)=sin(w't+kx)
 


Abdul Quadeer said:
As long as the function defining wave remains the same!
You can write 2. y=cos(wt-kx) as y=sin(π/2-wt+kx)=sin(w't+kx)

But how can one write it as sin(w't+kx)...w has to remain same and has to be positive...
And ya...how does it explain why 2 and 3 can not form a standing wave?
 


Abhishekdas said:
But how can one write it as sin(w't+kx)...w has to remain same and has to be positive...

My mistake.
Its y=sin(π/2-wt+kx)=sin(Φ-wt+kx). Compare this with y=sin(kx+wt).

Abhishekdas said:
And ya...how does it explain why 2 and 3 can not form a standing wave?

2. and 3. are traveling in the same direction. They can't produce a standing wave.
 


I am still not clear..how are they traveling in the same direction? if the velocities have opposite sign...
 
  • #10


Sorry for the late reply.
Yes you were correct earlier, 2 and 3 form standing waves. I was confused in the direction too. You can check the sign of kx if the function remains same, like y=Asin(wt-kx) and y=Asin(wt+kx). Note that if you write y=Asin(wt-kx) as y=-Asin(kx-wt), it does not change the direction, but reflects the wave w.r.t x-axis.

So to avoid the confusion, there is a fundamental method. If f(x,t) is the function representing a wave, then df/dt=0 (if wave shape remains constant, which is usually the case). Find out the sign of dx/dt from each equation and compare :smile:
 
Back
Top