Supermassive black hole in the Large Magellanic Cloud?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a supermassive black hole (SMBH) forming in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) for a sci-fi story involving a wormhole. While the LMC currently does not host an SMBH, it is suggested that it could potentially form one due to its mass. Research indicates that the LMC could support an SMBH of up to 10 million solar masses, with evidence from rotation curves supporting the possibility of a black hole around 1 million solar masses. However, the presence of an SMBH in the LMC would be unexpected, given its classification as a small galaxy without a bulge. The narrative premise of humanity detecting a wormhole leading to significant cosmic locations like M87 or the LMC is grounded in these scientific concepts, enhancing the story's believability.
Deleted member 690984
Ok, I know, it's science fiction, you can make anything work if you really want it to. I'm planning out a sci-fi story which I wanted to try and keep as grounded as possible in believable scientific concepts. For context, the basic premise is: humanity detects a wormhole on the outer edge of the solar system, and sends an expedition through it. The two locations I had in mind as to where the wormhole could lead include either M87 or the Large Magellanic Cloud. I want a supermassive black hole to feature in the story as part of the setting (hence M87 being one of them).

My question is simple: while the LMC does not have a supermassive black hole, is it beyond the realms of possibility for it to be able to form one? The LMC is approximately 158,200 light years from Earth, so we have a 158,200 year delay on anything that occurs there. Does the LMC have enough mass contained within to form a SMBH?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can say that, "the LMC does not have a supermassive black hole". This paper puts an upper limit of about 10 million solar masses on a SMBH in the LMC. So it could easily have a SMBH of a few million solar masses, similar to the one in the center of the Milky Way. Look at Figure 10 in this paper. The rotation curves look very consistent with a SMBH of 1 million solar masses, which would be consistent with the known mass of the LMC.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes BillTre, Deleted member 690984, Rive and 1 other person
Perfect! Thank you!
 
A SMBH in the LMC is not impossible, but it would be unexpected - it's a small galaxy with no bulge.
 
  • Like
Likes Deleted member 690984
We've just had an interesting thread about generation ships, but I don't think that that is the most reasonable way to colonize another planet. Fatal problems: - Crew may become chaotic and self destructive. - Crew may become so adapted to space as to be unwilling to return to a planet. - Making the planet habitable may take longer then the trip, so the ship needs to last far longer than just the journey. - Mid-flight malfunction may render the ship unable to decelerate at the destination...
I know this topic is extremely contraversial and debated, but I'm writing a book where an AI attempts to become as human as possible. Would it, eventually, especially in the far future, be possible for an AI to gain a conscious? To be clear, my definition of a consciousness being the ability to possess self-created morals, thoughts, and views, AKA a whole personality. And if this is possible (and let's just say it is for this question), about how long may it take for something to happen...
This is a question for people who know about astrophysics. It's been said that the habitable zones around red dwarf stars are so close to those stars that any planets in the zones would be tidally locked to the stars in question. With one side roasting and another side freezing almost forever, those planets wouldn't be hospitable to life. a) Could there be forms of life--whole ecologies--that first evolve in the planet's twilight zone and then extend their habitat by burrowing...
Back
Top