MHB Total ordered pair in factorial equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter juantheron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial Pair
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding integer ordered pairs (x, y) for the equations x^2 - y! = 2001 and x^2 - y! = 2013. For the first equation, it is established that x must be a multiple of 3, and y must be less than 6 due to the constraints of factorials and divisibility. The smallest square greater than 2001 is identified as 2025, providing a potential solution. A similar analysis applies to the second equation, where 2013 is also a multiple of 3 but not 9, leading to comparable restrictions on y. The exploration highlights the significant limitations on possible solutions due to the properties of factorials and divisibility.
juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
(A) Total no. of integer ordered pairs $(x,y)$ in $x^2-y! = 2001$

(B) Total no. of integer ordered pairs $(x,y)$ in $x^2-y! = 2013$

My Trail :: (A) Given $x^2-y! = 2001 = 3 \times 23 \times 29 \Rightarrow x^2 -y! = \left(3\times 23 \times 29\right)$

means $(x^2-y!)$ must be divisible by $3$ So $x = 3k$ anf $y\geq 3$, where $k\in \mathbb{Z}$

So $9k^2-y! = 3\times 23 \times 29$

Now How can i solve after that

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]The smallest square greater than $2001$ is $45^2 = 2025 = 4! + 2001$. So that gives you one solution.

You have shown that $x$ is a multiple of $3$, and so $x^2$ is a multiple of $9$. But $2001$ is not a multiple of $9$. So if $x^2 - y! = 2001$ then $y!$ must not be a multiple of $9$. Therefore $y<6$. That severely limits the number of possible solutions!

For (B), $2013$ is also a multiple of $3$ but not a multiple of $9$. So you can apply a very similar argument in that case too.[/sp]
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top