Understanding Inverse Trig Functions: Solving for Phi in Cos Using Inverse Sin

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for phi in a cosine function using inverse sine, highlighting confusion about the relationship between trigonometric functions and their inverses. The equation phi = sin^{-1}(c2 / (c1^2 + c2^2)^{1/2}) is derived, leading to phi = tan^{-1}(c2 / c1). Participants clarify that sine and cosine are related through complementary angles, which extends to their inverse functions. The confusion stems from the expectation to use inverse cosine instead of inverse sine, but the mathematical relationships validate the use of inverse sine in this context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these relationships in trigonometry.
chrisa88
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
How does this work? I'm very confused about the phi is solved using inverse sin.
knowing: A=(c^{2}_{1}+c^{2}_{2})^{1/2} and c_{2}= Acos(\phi)
solve for \phi
which yields: \phi=sin^{-1}\frac{c_{2}}{(c^{2}_{1}+c^{2}_{2})^{1/2}}=tan^{-1}\frac{c_{2}}{c_{1}}
I'm not sure how we use the inverse sin to find the phi in the cos function.
I thought to get the inside of the parenthesis of cos you would use inverse cos, or cos^{-1}. Where am I going wrong?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your math expressions are yielding an error here.

Just as there are many trigonometric relationships, so there are apparently just as many relations between their inverses. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_trigonometric_functions

As always, start with the easiest, defining relationships and build out from there. Note that as sine and cosine are related by complementary angles, so are their inverses.
 
I thought this was an error, but the solutions manual to my quantum mechanics class AND the handwritten solutions provided by my professor both have this error. Thank you for confirming!
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top