Unit Vectors and Vector Components

AI Thread Summary
In a Cartesian coordinate system, the x- and y-components of a force vector F can be expressed as F_x = |F| cos(θ) and F_y = |F| sin(θ). When determining the unit vector for F, the x- and y-components of this unit vector correspond to cos(θ) and sin(θ), respectively. This is achieved by dividing each component by the magnitude of the vector |F|. Understanding this relationship is essential for accurately breaking down vectors into their components. The discussion confirms that the unit vector components align with the trigonometric functions based on the angle θ.
Alexrey
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I remember in my first year physics classes, when dealing with a force F we would find the vector's x- and y-components using F_x=r cos(θ) and F_y=r sin(θ) I also remember learning in my mathematics classes about unit vectors, but cannot seem to remember using them to break vectors down into their respective x- and y-components. As such, I thought I'd ask this question: Am I correct in thinking that when using a Cartesian coordinate system to describe a force F, if we find the unit vector for F, are the x- and y- components of this unit vector equivalent to cos(θ) and sin(θ) respectively?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Alexrey said:
I remember in my first year physics classes, when dealing with a force F we would find the vector's x- and y-components using F_x=r cos(θ) and F_y=r sin(θ) I also remember learning in my mathematics classes about unit vectors, but cannot seem to remember using them to break vectors down into their respective x- and y-components. As such, I thought I'd ask this question: Am I correct in thinking that when using a Cartesian coordinate system to describe a force F, if we find the unit vector for F, are the x- and y- components of this unit vector equivalent to cos(θ) and sin(θ) respectively?
Yes, assuming θ is the angle that F makes with the x-axis.

Think about it.
Fx = |F| cos(θ)
Fy = |F| sin(θ)

To get unit vectors, divide each of the above by its magnitude, |F|.
 
Great, thank you.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
260
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top