Vertical asymptote with an epsilon-delta proof?

  • B
  • Thread starter mcastillo356
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Calculus
In summary, the conversation discusses the aim of proving a vertical asymptote for the function ##\frac{1}{x}## and the difficulties in finding a solution. The conversation mentions using the ordering of real numbers to show that the function is strictly decreasing and has no upper bound, leading to a vertical asymptote at zero. A proof is provided using a delta-epsilon proof, but it is noted that it is not a complete proof and more structure is needed.
  • #1
mcastillo356
Gold Member
560
267
TL;DR Summary
I've got a very recurred rational function for which I would like to find out the proof of the vertical asymptote.
Hi, PF

The aim is to prove how the approach from the left and right sides of the ##x##x axis eventually renders a vertical asymptote for the function ##\frac{1}{x}##. I've been searching in the textbook "Calculus", 7th edition, by Robert A. Adams and Christopher Essex, but I haven't found nothing but uncertain clues. Or naive proofs ( i.e., YouTube, mentioning the fact that the more we become near to zero at the abscissa, the less turns the ordinate). Any suggestion would be fine. Apologizes for not attempt provided.

Vertcal asymptote.jpg
Greetings!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Doesn't this follow directly from the ordering of the real numbers? From that you have that

(1) [itex]x^{-1}[/itex] is strictly decreasing for [itex]x > 0[/itex] ([itex]0 < x < y < 1 \Leftrightarrow 1 < 1/y < 1/x [/itex]).
(2) [itex]\{x^{-1} : x > 0 \}[/itex] has no upper bound (consider the sequence [itex]x_n = n^{-1}[/itex] for integer [itex]n > 0[/itex].)
(3) Multiplication by -1 reverses order.

EDIT: There is a vertical asymptote at zero for essentially the same reasons that [itex]x^{-1} \to 0[/itex] as [itex]x \to \infty[/itex]; it is easy to see that the curve [itex](x,x^{-1})[/itex] is symmetric about the line [itex](x,x)[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
  • #4
Hi, PF, I've been working with help a delta-epsilon proof of a left-sided limit when ##x\rightarrow{0^-}## for the function ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}##:

##\forall{\,\epsilon>0}\,\exists{\,\delta>0}##, such that if ##-\delta<x<0##, then ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon##

If we choose ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}>0##, and substitute in ##-\delta<x<0##, we obtain ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon<0##. Therefore it is proved that ##\lim_{x\rightarrow{0^-}}{\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}}=-\infty##

Is it right? Is ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}## the solution?

Greetings!
 
  • #5
mcastillo356 said:
Hi, PF, I've been working with help a delta-epsilon proof of a left-sided limit when ##x\rightarrow{0^-}## for the function ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}##:

##\forall{\,\epsilon>0}\,\exists{\,\delta>0}##, such that if ##-\delta<x<0##, then ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon##

If we choose ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}>0##, and substitute in ##-\delta<x<0##, we obtain ##\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}<-\epsilon<0##. Therefore it is proved that ##\lim_{x\rightarrow{0^-}}{\displaystyle\frac{1}{x}}=-\infty##

Is it right? Is ##\delta=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\epsilon}## the solution?

Greetings!
It's the outline of a proof, but not a proof. Also, you begin by stating what it is you want to prove. It's not clear whether this is an assumption (which would be wrong) or a statement of what you are trying to prove.

You must be able to structure an elementary proof correctly before you can tackle more complicated proofs.
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356

1. What is a vertical asymptote?

A vertical asymptote is a line on a graph that a function approaches but never touches. It is a point where the function's value increases or decreases without bound, and it is usually represented by a dashed line on a graph.

2. What is an epsilon-delta proof?

An epsilon-delta proof is a method used to rigorously prove the existence of a limit in calculus. It involves using two variables, epsilon and delta, to show that as the input to a function gets closer to a certain value, the output of the function gets closer to a specific limit.

3. How do you prove the existence of a vertical asymptote using an epsilon-delta proof?

To prove the existence of a vertical asymptote using an epsilon-delta proof, you must show that as the input to a function approaches a certain value, the output of the function approaches infinity or negative infinity. This is done by setting epsilon to a very large number and finding a corresponding delta value that ensures the function's output will be within that range.

4. Why is it important to use an epsilon-delta proof to prove the existence of a vertical asymptote?

Using an epsilon-delta proof is important because it provides a rigorous and precise way to prove the existence of a vertical asymptote. It eliminates any ambiguity or potential errors in the proof and ensures that the limit of the function truly does approach infinity or negative infinity.

5. Can you give an example of an epsilon-delta proof for a vertical asymptote?

Yes, for example, to prove that the function f(x) = 1/x has a vertical asymptote at x = 0, we can set epsilon to a very large number, say 100, and find a corresponding delta value. Let's say delta = 0.01. Then, for any x within 0.01 units of 0, the output of the function will be within 100 units of infinity. This shows that as x approaches 0, the output of the function approaches infinity, proving the existence of a vertical asymptote.

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
923
  • Calculus
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top