Visualisation in math and physics

In summary, physicists and mathematicians tend to use a numerical-quantitative approach to problem solving, although some areas of mathematics may benefit from visualization. Physics textbooks often include diagrams and figures, suggesting the use of spatial-visual reasoning.
  • #1
trees and plants
Hello. Do physicists and mathematicians visualise math formulas or specialised math or physics words?

Words like metric space, Lindelof space, metrizable space, Gamma function, harmonic function, mathematical limits, series, power series, Laurent series, phase space, symplectic space, observator, spacelike, timelike curves,vectors, Jacobi fields, spacetime, n-sphere, n-manifold, Banach space, convex function? Or formulas like the Gauss-Codazzi equation, ##m_1a_1+m_2a_2+m_3a_3=0##, ##<x,y>=x_1y_1+...+x_ny_n##, the transformation law in tensor analysis , the Riemann curvature tensor, the Christoffel symbols, the Gauss map, the shape operator?

Do they visualise them like physical objects for the symbols or images from things they know for he symbols in the formulas or the words?This also helps i think in learning, memorising and understanding. When they want to make questions or when they read scientific works do they visualise to understand?Or when they try to answer scientific questions? Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A study showed that physicists and mathematicians tended to have a very numerical-quantitative approach to problem solving, whereas chemists, biologists, etc. were more closely aligned with spatial-visual reasoning. I can't find the link right now, but it does suggest that physicists and mathematicians use less visualization than chemists and biologists. If you read a physics/maths textbook vs. a chemistry or biology textbook, this becomes very apparent.
 
  • #3
On the other hand, some areas of mathematics are more easily understandable if there are some images involved. For example, geometry, trigonometry, differential and integral calculus, group theory, among others. As far as physics is concerned, just examine any textbook, and let me know if you find any with no diagrams or figures. I don't disbelieve that some study showed physicist and mathematicians had a strong numerical-quantitative approach to problem solving, but I believe that many of them also draw upon their abilities in spatial-visual reasoning.
 
  • Like
Likes SSequence

1. What is the purpose of visualisation in math and physics?

Visualisation is used in math and physics to help students and researchers understand complex concepts and relationships by representing them in a visual form. It can also aid in problem-solving and making connections between different concepts.

2. What types of visualisation techniques are commonly used in math and physics?

Some common techniques include graphs, diagrams, charts, and models. These can be used to represent data, equations, and physical systems in a visual way.

3. How does visualisation help in understanding abstract concepts?

Visualisation can make abstract concepts more concrete and easier to grasp by providing a visual representation that can be manipulated and explored. It can also help in identifying patterns and relationships that may not be apparent in written or numerical form.

4. Can visualisation be used in advanced math and physics topics?

Yes, visualisation can be used in advanced topics such as calculus, quantum mechanics, and relativity. In fact, visualisation is often used in research and simulations to aid in understanding complex mathematical and physical phenomena.

5. Are there any limitations to visualisation in math and physics?

While visualisation can be a powerful tool, it is important to remember that it is just one aspect of understanding math and physics. It is not a substitute for analytical thinking and problem-solving skills, and it is important to use visualisation in conjunction with other methods of learning and understanding these subjects.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
19
Views
876
Replies
0
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
701
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
0
Views
697
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
16
Views
3K
Back
Top