What could a time machine plausibly look like?

In summary, the conversation revolved around the possibility and limitations of time travel, with the participant seeking clarification and input on their ideas for a science fiction novel. The discussion touched on various theories and methods of time travel, including the potential use of wormholes. There was also mention of the "grandfather paradox" and the concept of alternate universes. In the end, it was suggested that the most plausible scenario for time travel would involve branching into alternate universes.
  • #1
ToBoldlyKnow
So, I've been doing some research for a novel I'm working on that's based around time travel, but seeing as I'm definitely no expert on the theories concerning it, thought it might help to have someone a little more knowledgeable on the subject review my ideas.

Thus far, I've done some reading up on it, and know the basics. From what I've gathered, time travel is possible, but not to any point in time before the hypothetical date when it's invented (however, one reputable source I found seems to dispute this, commenting on a traveler being able to encounter dinosours, but I'm assuming that's generally not the consensus, right?). There seem to be three methods of travel that are widely discussed as possible: orbiting a black hole, traveling at near-light speeds, and wormholes, though out of these three, only the wormhole option works for what I'm attempting to envision - a method of time travel that could transport people to the future, and then back to the time they left. If all that's correct, great, but if not, do let me know. :)

Now, onto my question... well, questions. :p Could there - hypothetically - be a way to either create a wormhole or locate and use a preexisting one on Earth, not in space? If so, what might that look like, how might it be accomplished, and what materials/components would be involved? If someone were to go through it, what might they experience? And, finally, once they get to the the other side, assuming any components needed to use/operate such a wormhole were maintained over the years by future generations, could the traveler go back to their own time?

Oh, and I'm also curious whether having a traveler be able to change their future - but the past of the time they travel to - would be realistic based on what we know now. From what I've found, this seems to be quite the subject of debate, so to clarify, I'm not looking for personal opinions or reasoning, but rather checking that there isn't any evidence to dispute this idea as of yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to PF! Thread moved to science fiction:
ToBoldlyLearn said:
Thus far, I've done some reading up on it, and know the basics. From what I've gathered, time travel is possible, but not to any point in time before the hypothetical date when it's invented (however, one reputable source I found seems to dispute this, commenting on a traveler being able to encounter dinosours, but I'm assuming that's generally not the consensus, right?).
I don't think I've ever seen a time machine so constrained. Do you have any examples? The closest I can think of was the "Quantum Leap" model, which IIRC could take him back as far as the date he was born...which always struck me as a little contrived and was probably done for budgetary reasons.
 
  • #3
Consensus in physics is that time travel is as impossible as it can be, period. That doesn't mean that it's totally impossible, but anything else is more likely to happen.

Some people still research this stuff, but I don't think there is anything close to a consensus on the grandfathers paradox.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #4
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF! Thread moved to science fiction:

Whoops, sorry... I actually didn't see there was a forum for sci-fi here. Thanks, and my bad!

russ_watters said:
I don't think I've ever seen a time machine so constrained. Do you have any examples? The closest I can think of was the "Quantum Leap" model, which IIRC could take him back as far as the date he was born...which always struck me as a little contrived and was probably done for budgetary reasons.

I'm not familliar with Quantum Leap, but, yeah, that sounds pretty unrealistic. Not quite sure what you're asking, though - examples for what, specifically?
 
  • #5
Gigaz said:
Some people still research this stuff, but I don't think there is anything close to a consensus on the grandfathers paradox.

Yep, that was the impression I got as well. :) From closed timelike curves to alternate universes, it definitely seems like there's a lot of disagreement on what would happen in such a scenario.
 
  • #6
ToBoldlyLearn said:
Yep, that was the impression I got as well. :) From closed timelike curves to alternate universes, it definitely seems like there's a lot of disagreement on what would happen in such a scenario.

I think there are three major plausible scenarios.
First, time travel is impossible.
Second, time travel is possible, but you need continuity of the wave function and therefore, paths with a paradoxon are simply forbidden. You could try to murder your own grandfather, but you would necessarily fail for some reason.
Third, you get some sort of realization within many worlds interpretation such that any time travel branches of a new universe and you could never go back to the future from which you started.
 
  • #7
If you write like Douglas Adams, the time machine might be just an app for your iPhone, or look like a city bus, and you book time trips with T-uber. :woot:
 
  • #8
Thanks, Gigaz (for some reason it's not letting me quote your post, and tagging members doesn't seem to be a thing here, so just going to adress you by name and hope that clears up any confusion XP ). The third one's the one I'd be going with, then; it's good to know alternate universes are an option. :)
 
  • #9
anorlunda said:
If you write like Douglas Adams, the time machine might be just an app for your iPhone, or look like a city bus, and you book time trips with T-uber. :woot:

I don't think anyone can write quite like Douglas Adams... :woot:

But, yeah, think I'm going to keep my time travel a little less common. :)
 
  • #10
Orbiting a black hole and traveling at near light speed will get you to the future more quickly than just waiting around for it, but neither one will get you to the past. Wormholes I'm not sure about but probably since they could amount to faster than light travel
 
  • #11
phinds said:
Orbiting a black hole and traveling at near light speed will get you to the future more quickly than just waiting around for it, but neither one will get you to the past. Wormholes I'm not sure about but probably since they could amount to faster than light travel

Yep, hence why I chose the wormhole option. :)
 
  • #12
Check the Ally Oop comic strip for a well known time machine.
 
  • #13
ToBoldlyLearn said:
I'm not familliar with Quantum Leap, but, yeah, that sounds pretty unrealistic.

Not quite sure what you're asking, though - examples for what, specifically?
Examples from where you have seen/heard about time travel constrained by the date of its invention.
 
  • #14
My guess is it would look something like a police telephone box in London, around 1960.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #15
Dr.D said:
Check the Ally Oop comic strip for a well known time machine.

Thanks! Could be a good source of inspiration.

rootone said:
My guess is it would look something like a police telephone box in London, around 1960.

Well, as awesome as the TARDIS is, I think it's about the farthest from 'plausible' you can get concerning realistic time machines. :-p
 
  • #16
ToBoldlyLearn said:
Well, as awesome as the TARDIS is, I think it's about the farthest from 'plausible' you can get concerning realistic time machines. :-p
I think one the doctor's incarnations (Tom Baker?), had figured out that the chameleon circuit had a problem with the fluid link.
Then suddenly Neanderthals started poking on the TARDIS with spears.
 
  • #17
rootone said:
I think one the doctor's incarnations (Tom Baker?), had figured out that the chameleon circuit had a problem with the fluid link.
Then suddenly Neanderthals started poking on the TARDIS with spears.

I'll take your word for that; I've seen both the old and the new Who, but still have some catching up to do with some of the earlier incarnations of the Doctor, and haven't seen any of Four (Baker) yet. :)
 
  • #18
As far as I remember the doc's assistant, a mere earthling, confused those guys by wearing a miniskirt and big ear rings.
But then then the daleks, that trick would not work on them
 
  • #19
According to general relativity, wormholes can only exist if they have always existed. You can not create or destroy them because that would require seaming or tearing the fabric of spacetime. So in order to have a time machine, it would have to somehow contain one end of the Einstein-Rosen bridge as well as being able to manipulate the other end of it. Whatever the technology is to do that, would require insane amounts of power, so the bulk of your time machine would probably be an antimatter powered generator or something.
 
  • #20
A gravitational wormhole would look sort of like a black hole. It would strongly bend light, creating an Einstein ring around it. Let us suppose for fictional sake that it can be made stable and stored on Earth. It would be hard to confine on Earth since there's no way to attach harnesses to it and it tends to destroy everything around it with extreme tidal forces. It's likely that if technology exists to maintain this sort of thing, people have discovered some sort of antigravity which is needed to hold this thing open and keep it from falling toward the center of the Earth and spaghettifying the Earth.
 
  • #21
newjerseyrunner said:
According to general relativity, wormholes can only exist if they have always existed. You can not create or destroy them because that would require seaming or tearing the fabric of spacetime. So in order to have a time machine, it would have to somehow contain one end of the Einstein-Rosen bridge as well as being able to manipulate the other end of it. Whatever the technology is to do that, would require insane amounts of power, so the bulk of your time machine would probably be an antimatter powered generator or something.

Khashishi said:
A gravitational wormhole would look sort of like a black hole. It would strongly bend light, creating an Einstein ring around it. Let us suppose for fictional sake that it can be made stable and stored on Earth. It would be hard to confine on Earth since there's no way to attach harnesses to it and it tends to destroy everything around it with extreme tidal forces. It's likely that if technology exists to maintain this sort of thing, people have discovered some sort of antigravity which is needed to hold this thing open and keep it from falling toward the center of the Earth and spaghettifying the Earth

Thanks, guys - this helps a bunch! :smile:
 
  • #22
If you really want serious, search ER=EPR on YouTube. He discusses worm holes that connect the interior of two black holes. The only problem is that you can't exit the black holes to tell anyone what you saw.
 
  • #23
anorlunda said:
If you really want serious, search ER=EPR on YouTube. He discusses worm holes that connect the interior of two black holes. The only problem is that you can't exit the black holes to tell anyone what you saw.

Thanks, will definitely look it up. That does put an unfortunate glitch in the storyline I had planned out, though... may wind up just bending the rules a little (or my plot outline, if I can). :-p
 

1. What is the concept behind a time machine?

A time machine is a hypothetical device that would allow an individual to travel through time and potentially change the course of history. The concept is based on the theory of time dilation, which suggests that time can be manipulated by altering the speed at which an object travels.

2. How does a time machine work?

The exact workings of a time machine are still a matter of speculation and debate. Some scientists propose that it would involve bending space-time using exotic matter or cosmic strings. Others suggest that it could involve creating a wormhole or utilizing advanced technology such as quantum entanglement.

3. Could a time machine be built in the future?

While there are currently no known methods for building a time machine, some scientists believe that it may be possible in the distant future as our understanding of physics and technology advances. However, it is important to note that time travel is still considered a theoretical concept and may not be feasible at all.

4. Would a time machine have any limitations?

The limitations of a time machine would depend on the specific design and technology used. Some limitations that have been proposed include the inability to travel to a time before the machine was created, the potential for creating paradoxes, and the physical and psychological effects on the traveler.

5. What could a time machine plausibly look like?

There is no definitive answer to this question as the appearance of a time machine would largely depend on its design and function. Some depictions in science fiction often involve a machine with sleek, futuristic technology, while others propose a more subtle and inconspicuous device.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
999
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
664
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top