MHB What is P(B) given P(A|~B) = 1/2 and P(B?AUB) = 2/5?

AI Thread Summary
To find P(B) given P(A|~B) = 1/2 and P(B?AUB) = 2/5, the discussion revolves around understanding the notation and applying conditional probability formulas. The user is confused about the notation "B?AUB," prompting a request for clarification. The conditional probability formula is emphasized as a key tool for solving the problem. The final answer for P(B) is stated to be 1/4, but the user struggles to reach this conclusion. Further explanation and clarification are needed to proceed with the calculations.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all

I have a little problem with this short question, would appreciate your help.

Let A and B be two events such that:

P(A|~B) = 1/2 and P(B?AUB) = 2/5

(~B means not B)

Find P(B)

The final answer should be 1/4, I can't get there. I did some work with the conditional probability formula, got P(B)=2/5 * P(AUB) and P(B)=1-2*P(A and ~B). But where do I go from here ?

Thank you in advance !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Yankel!

I'm not sure what you mean by this: P(B?AUB) = 2/5. Could you explain? It's the question mark that's confusing me.

Anytime I see the phrase "conditional probability" I always write out the formula: $$P[A|B]=\frac{P[A \cap B]}{P}$$.

In this case we're given: $$P[A|B']=\frac{P[A \cap B']}{P[B']}=\frac{1}{2}$$.

So if you can explain my above question I'll try to help more. :)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top