MHB What is the reference angle for 60° and -60°?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Reference
AI Thread Summary
The reference angle for 60° is calculated as R = 90° - 60°, resulting in a reference angle of 30°. However, the book states the reference angle is 60°. For -60°, the reference angle is found in Quadrant 4, calculated as R = -90° + 60°, yielding -30°, but again the book indicates the reference angle is 60°. The discussion highlights the standard rules for determining reference angles across different quadrants. Additionally, participants inquire about algebraic methods for finding reference angles, which leads to further clarification.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
1. Find the reference angle given 60°.

Let R = reference angle

I decided to graph 60°. We are in Quadrant 1.

R = 90° - 60°

R = 30°

Book's answer for R is 60°.

2. Find the reference angle given - 60°.

I decided to graph - 60°. We are in Quadrant 4.

R = -90° - (-60°)

R = -90° + 60°

R = -30°

Book's answer for R is 60°.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
for $0 < \theta < 90$, reference angle is $\theta$

for $90 < \theta < 180$, reference angle is $180-\theta$

for $180 < \theta < 270$, reference angle is $\theta-180$

for $270 < \theta < 360$, reference angle is $360-\theta$

reference-angle.png
 
Helpful picture reply.

Is there an algebraic method for finding the reference angle?
 
RTCNTC said:
Helpful picture reply.

Is there an algebraic method for finding the reference angle?

look at what I posted prior to the pic ...
 
skeeter said:
look at what I posted prior to the pic ...

I see it now. Thanks.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top