MHB What is the Result of Plugging g(x) Into f(x)?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the composition of two functions, specifically f(g(x)), where f(x) = 4x + 7 and g(x) = 3x^2. The correct computation yields f(g(x)) = 12x^2 + 7, which differs from the book's answer of 12x^2 + 21x. Participants emphasize the need for clarity on the functions involved to provide accurate assistance. The discrepancy between the calculated result and the book's answer remains unresolved.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
The question wants (f•g)(x). I understand this to be
f(g(x)).

This means to plug the value of g(x) into every x I see in f(x) and simplify.

f(3x^2) = 4(3x^2) + 7

f(3x^2) = 12x^2 + 7

So, f(g(x)) = 12x^2 + 7.

This is not the book's answer.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
RTCNTC said:
The question wants (f•g)(x). I understand this to be
f(g(x)).

This means to plug the value of g(x) into every x I see in f(x) and simplify.

f(3x^2) = 4(3x^2) + 7

f(3x^2) = 12x^2 + 7

So, f(g(x)) = 12x^2 + 7.

This is not the book's answer.
What are your functions f(x), g(x)? Can't help you if we don't know that! Please give us the whole problem.

-Dan
 
f(x) = 4x + 7

g(x) = 3x^2
 
f(x) = 4x + 7

g(x) = 3x^2

So, f(g(x)) = 12x^2 + 7.

This is not the book's answer.

For the two functions you cite, your solution is correct ... what is the "book answer" ?
 
Book's answer:

12x^2+21x.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top