Why is e^-1 considered the inverse of the natural logarithm?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the exponential function and the natural logarithm, specifically why e^-1 is considered the inverse of the natural logarithm. It clarifies that if y = ln(x), then x = e^y, establishing the inverse relationship. The mention of charging and discharging capacitors highlights the use of e^-1 in equations like Q=Qmax(1-e^-1), which relates to exponential decay. The term e^-1 can be interpreted as 1/e, reinforcing the concept of inverse in the context of natural logarithms. Understanding this relationship is crucial in applications involving exponential growth and decay.
Bengo
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Why is e^-1 the inverse of natural log e? Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your question is confusing. Let y = ln(x), then x = ey. If x = e, y = 1.
 
Well I was reading a section on charging/ discharging capacitors and this is what it said: charge on a capacitor builds up on the capacitors plates exponentially, indicated in the passage by the repeated appearance in the charge equation of e^-1, the inverse of the natural log e. And I think the equation they are referring to is Q=Qmax(1- e^-1).
 
Could it mean "the inverse of the [basis of the] natural log[,] e"? As e-1 = 1/e
 
mfb said:
Could it mean "the inverse of the [basis of the] natural log[,] e"? As e-1 = 1/e


Ok I'll go with that because it's what I was thinking too. Thank you!
 

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Can a log have multiple bases?
Replies
44
Views
4K
B Creating Log Tables: Briggs' 400-Year-Old Accomplishment
Replies
10
Views
2K
B How to express ##3^{\sqrt(2)}## in terms of natural logarithms
Replies
10
Views
1K
MHB A logarithm formula involving the mascheroni constant
Replies
6
Views
2K
I When is it preferable to use semi-log and log-log graphs?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Calculation of x from log equation
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Is there a name for this approximation?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B I do not understand Log tables
Replies
15
Views
3K
I What are the applications of inverses of vector functions?
Replies
17
Views
3K
Taking the natural logarithm of e^(2i*pi)
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top