- #1
Justice Hunter
- 98
- 7
Hey everyone,
So I'm writing the script for a Youtube show I'm making, and it's pretty heavy on the science/physics side in terms of exposition.
So before i jump into what i want to ask let me just briefly explain the story.
A Time traveler and his time traveling machine go back 30 years in time. On the way, the machine breaks up, part of it landing in a facility, the other crashing into the ocean. The time traveler survives blah blah blah.
Now the machine lands in a corporate RnD facility, and so a bunch of scientists begin researching it, they find out it's part of a time traveling machine, and so they have a discussion about the implication of time travel and chaos theory amongst their collegues.
Now the discussion goes a bit like this. The scientist begins by stating a simple example :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Joe Blow enjoys a chicken sandwich at this Time(T)=0, in the specific, macro quantum state Ψjoe1
Any event happening anywhere within the causal, and non-causal universe at T=0 can not effect the quantum state of Ψjoe1 in any way."
He continues on by saying that as Time (T) goes into negative values, the probability that Joe blow will eat a Ham sandwich(Ψjoe2) instead of a chicken sandwich(Ψjoe1) will increase, and that any event within the causal universe can act as the cause for this change in event. The value increases exponentially, and is inversely proportional to the distance of the cause, and of Ψjoe1 (basically like a field emanating from Joe, except that field is a field of probability that joe would eat a Ham sandwich, which increases in scope as T goes further into negative value.
He summarizes by saying that by 1950, the chance that Joe Blow would have Ham instead of chicken would be .0000001%(arbitrarily low number), the same probability that he would eat a stick of dynamite.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So you if someone could help me out in articulating my idea a bit better, because i believe that i could better arrive at the final joke (i know it's a lame joke but i think it's funny), and if anyone could provide an equation that is actually real instead of the made-up ones i provided that would be great. thanks in advance.
So I'm writing the script for a Youtube show I'm making, and it's pretty heavy on the science/physics side in terms of exposition.
So before i jump into what i want to ask let me just briefly explain the story.
A Time traveler and his time traveling machine go back 30 years in time. On the way, the machine breaks up, part of it landing in a facility, the other crashing into the ocean. The time traveler survives blah blah blah.
Now the machine lands in a corporate RnD facility, and so a bunch of scientists begin researching it, they find out it's part of a time traveling machine, and so they have a discussion about the implication of time travel and chaos theory amongst their collegues.
Now the discussion goes a bit like this. The scientist begins by stating a simple example :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Joe Blow enjoys a chicken sandwich at this Time(T)=0, in the specific, macro quantum state Ψjoe1
Any event happening anywhere within the causal, and non-causal universe at T=0 can not effect the quantum state of Ψjoe1 in any way."
He continues on by saying that as Time (T) goes into negative values, the probability that Joe blow will eat a Ham sandwich(Ψjoe2) instead of a chicken sandwich(Ψjoe1) will increase, and that any event within the causal universe can act as the cause for this change in event. The value increases exponentially, and is inversely proportional to the distance of the cause, and of Ψjoe1 (basically like a field emanating from Joe, except that field is a field of probability that joe would eat a Ham sandwich, which increases in scope as T goes further into negative value.
He summarizes by saying that by 1950, the chance that Joe Blow would have Ham instead of chicken would be .0000001%(arbitrarily low number), the same probability that he would eat a stick of dynamite.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So you if someone could help me out in articulating my idea a bit better, because i believe that i could better arrive at the final joke (i know it's a lame joke but i think it's funny), and if anyone could provide an equation that is actually real instead of the made-up ones i provided that would be great. thanks in advance.