When Should You Use Linearity, Substitution, or Partial Integration?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TKay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the appropriate use of linearity, substitution, and partial integration in solving integrals, specifically the integral of x*e^(-3x) dx. The participants emphasize the importance of integration by parts to reduce polynomial factors and the utility of substitution when a function's derivative is present. The LIATE rule is introduced as a method for determining the best choice for u in integration problems, prioritizing Logarithmic, Inverse Trigonometric, Algebraic, Trigonometric, and Exponential functions. The correct application of these techniques leads to a clearer understanding and successful integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic integral calculus concepts
  • Familiarity with integration techniques such as integration by parts
  • Knowledge of the LIATE rule for choosing u in substitution
  • Experience with exponential functions and their derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice integration by parts with various polynomial and exponential functions
  • Study the LIATE rule in depth to improve substitution technique
  • Explore advanced integration techniques, such as reduction formulas
  • Work on problems involving mixed functions to identify the best integration method
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians seeking to refine their integration skills, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of integral calculus techniques.

TKay
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, Forum!


I just registered after seeing you actually help people understand their problems. That's great.

We have (or should have) learned about linearity, substitution and partial integration. However, I don't know when to use which! Could someone also give me a bit of an expanation on this? :(

I have to solve an integral:
x*e^(-3x) dx

My train of thought: I have almost got 2 'basis integrals': x dx and e^x dx. I probably need to substitute to get them to the basic form. But how!
As you see I'm pretty clueless, but what I came up with was:
u = -3x --> u'= -3
v' = x --> v = (x²)/2
However, this leads nowhere. I don't know what to do!

According to derive, the solution is supposed to be:
Code:
     1           -3x  ⎛    x            1       ⎞ 
⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ - e           ⎜⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ + ⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯ ⎟
          2            ⎜ 3·LN(e)              2⎟
 9·LN(e)             ⎝               9·LN(e) ⎠

I sincerely hope someone will be able to show me the light!
Thanks in advance.

PS: Our teacher is really bad at teaching!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try u = x and v' = e^(-3x)

In integration by parts what you're looking to do is reduce any x factors to a constant and thus you set those equal to u. This reduces the right hand side integral to a single function which should be easy to deal with.

If the x factors are higher powers then apply the integration by parts method until the x reduces to a constant or you can come up with a reduction formula.

The substitution method is a little intuitive because you're looking for something that is a derivative of something else in the function. Just keep practising some substitution questions and you will soon start to spot them fairly easily.

For example:

\int xe^{x^2} dx

You can spot that x is almost the derivative of x2. So we use the following substitution:

u=x^2 therefore \frac{du}{dx}=2x \Rightarrow xdx=\frac{1}{2}du

\frac{1}{2} \int e^u du = \frac{1}{2} e^{x^2} + c
 
Last edited:
The LIATE rule helps you identify which one to use as u.
Order of priority is:

Logarithms, Inverse Trigonometric, Algebraic, Trigonometric, Exponential
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K