@nvn:
Thanks for that adjustment.
To encapsulate, it looks as if the correction for mass distribution must reflect the center of mass for the section which is being evaluated here. In other words, the result from either approach may be corrected by multiplying what would be Fc by 2/3. This...
@nvn:
Hope you had a good weekend.
I'd like to start by "spreading out" your original post to make things easy for us and all who may come this way in the future; and work down from there.
To begin:
The pressure on the cylinder wall will vary along the wall height. If you take a vertical...
@nvn:
Of course. Due to the relatively small amount of pressure due to g (in this case), I had mentally just factored it out; hence my reference to a parabolic profile.
Thanks for clarifying.
I've "spread out" your math; and will work it soon. It looks really straightforward; but...
@nvn:
Thanks for your help.
I do have one question stemming from what you mentioned at the outset:
I'm not sure how this would apply to a completely filled and completely enclosed spinning cylinder; as there would apparently be no way for the entrained (incompressible) fluidmass to...
@Dr.D:
I see a couple of possibilities in these remarks which the TOS could bear upon.
Firstly, if you're soliciting business:
If you're not, there's always this:
Good day to you, sir.
Now, is there anyone else who might be able to work with me here to elucidate the particulars...
@Dr.D:
Thank you for your response.
However, I am not a student: I am simply looking to apply a quick, handy form of one of Newton's equations to a problem which I have run across. I do not have time to reinvent the wheel with this particular matter; and am hoping that someone with...
Good day.
This is a reformulation of another post which I made with the physics guys at the Forum ;)
OK. Here's the scoop:
Through some helpful input from another source, I have found that the following handy equation
Fc (N) = 4 m pi2 n2 r / 602
can be used to determine the restraining...