Recent content by adrianmitrea

  1. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    between any two consecutive squares, there exist at least two primes. the proof is for the first prime; the existence of the second prime can be proven similarly
  2. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    One way I can prove the two primes theorem is: let p be the greatest prime p | p^2 and p | p(p+1) p(p+1) - p^2 = p, therefore there are p integers greater than p^2 and less than or equal to p(p+1) however, p^2 is an additional data point, so there are actually p+1 integers between p^2 and...
  3. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    probability generally deals with a continuous distribution, but logic is typically discrete. Furthermore, probability has as its range all real numbers between 0 and 1, and logic is at its most complex form countably infinite. however my research deals with any prime number of states (i.e. 5 or...
  4. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    I agree, but I wanted to begin with a basic example that defines the concept of logical states. A more involved example is the algebraic extension of prime-state logic; however, it is still useful to restrict my range to 2 states. I can define an operator on the domain of statements as a...
  5. A

    How Large Must a Circle Be for a Tangent to Cover an Area?

    that is why I used quotes, they are not really points that terminate the line. they are more like the boundary of infinity; two coincident lines can "grow" at different rates, and the line that grows fastest will enclose the other line. The enclosed line would have endpoints within the outer...
  6. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    also, I would still like to know if anyone can prove the two primes theorem...
  7. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    well it is a kind of obscure example, but I am using more general definitions of statements and predicates. a statement is any quantity, whether it is defined or not, and what I called predicates are more like outcomes, so I will use the latter term to describe them in my example, each cell is...
  8. A

    How Large Must a Circle Be for a Tangent to Cover an Area?

    from a topological point of view, both structures are infinite; without beginning or end. ie the "endpoints" of a line can coincide at infinity, and thus form a closed loop topologically equivalent to a circle. Furthermore, any segment of the line WILL contain the "center" of the line. I...
  9. A

    How Large Must a Circle Be for a Tangent to Cover an Area?

    that is what I meant by a differential scale also, you are right, a tangent can intersect a cubic curve in more than one point, and that is just one case...
  10. A

    How Large Must a Circle Be for a Tangent to Cover an Area?

    at a small enough scale, a circle is identical to a line; i am referring to a differential scale... however, a tangent will never intersect any curve more than once.
  11. A

    How Large Must a Circle Be for a Tangent to Cover an Area?

    Maybe another way to look at this is: how close do you need to be to the surface of the circle/sphere for it to appear flat?
  12. A

    How to Calculate the Central Value for Unbalanced Gas Emission Data?

    I think you are referring to the mean? the median is defined as the central data point via the exclusion of extrema. where do the percentages come from?
  13. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    Unfortunately, I am not done with the proof, as I now have two sub-cases to prove. Logical states are basically a numeric mapping between predicates and statements. In this case I am using a more general definition of "predicate" than is typically used in predicate logic; they (predicates)...
  14. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    My theory of algebraic logic is that a logical vector can be transformed into an algebraic vector by multiplying the logical vector by the inverse of a transformation matrix. this theory only works for structures with a prime number of states
  15. A

    The algebraic analysis of logic

    another part of the theorem is that there exist primes p and q such that n^2 < p <= n(n+1) < q < (n+1)^2 where n is an integer greater than or equal to 1.
Back
Top