Recent content by alibongo

I agree with you xxChrisxx, this is most confusing. You're keen on simulations, look at the sim for the Pentagon hit. The wings fold back and break off at impact. Shure posted some very relevant points, but you resorted to insults, like you did when I posted relevant questions. It seems...

This thread is not concerning the first impact, where did you get that idea xxChrisxx? Hookes Law has already pointed out it's not relevant to compare a simulation of the first impact with a video of the second impact. To clarify, this thread is about the alleged video footage showing the...

Please don't close the thread, I came here for answers and haven't had a decent explanation yet.

I punched the paper towel, I didn't notice any deceleration, but I did notice the towel break at the moment I punched it. The plane doesn't break at all as it enters the tower wall, it just glides in, shouldn't parts of the plane have broken off, especially the tail or wings? Also there's a...

I'm tired of waiting for Hookes Law to make a clip ! Here's a clip with the argument about the frame rate. Although the 911 plane hit footage only has 25-30 frames per second, you can still see there's no deceleration, and no breakage of the plane. Most film only has 25-30 frames...

I'll look for one, that one I posted today is the best quality I've found so far.

I am trying to understand, but your comparison makes me think if I drove my car into a wall at high speed, it might go through the wall without any deceleration. Here's another clip.

There seems to be some confusion about the question I asked. This thread is not about eye-witnesses, or how the plane could have been faked. Can you post about the crash physics and show me where the plane appears to deform Chris? Or make a new thread for discussing CGI, eyewitnesses, and...

Please, no talk of CGI enhancement. Why are you mentioning hundreds or thousands of eye witnesses? Eyewitnesses to what? Something probably did hit the towers, but the videos I posted look very odd. What about the fuel ignition, I thought some fuel is carried in the wings. Shouldn't the fuel...

A wrecking ball is dense and heavy, it's designed to smash through walls.

You can tell it slows down because the debris takes longer to travel out the other side of the buiding?! Shouldn't you be able to see it slowing down as it impacts? I ask again, at what point should the deceleration present itself? Where in the videos I posted does the plane deform? The plane...

Thanks Chris, but I'm curious about the transfer of energy. Shouldn't the plane slow down as it hits? I didn't think planes were bloody stiff, I thought they were made with aluminium. Shouldn't the plane have bucked immediately? Like Dangers comparison with the mosquito and the train...

Danger, there's no problem with your eyesight, there is simply no damage to the wall. I'm more interested in the deceleration though, shouldn't 500,000 tons of steel slow down the plane? At what point should the deceleration present itself? (I'm not into conspiracy theories, I can't stand...

Thanks for the replies. My physics is so limited I'll show you what I'm trying to understand, rather than attempting to explain it. Here's a clip with two fake crashes, which one is the most realistic in terms of physics? The bottom one seems more realistic to me, with the deceleration...