I think I am confusing myselfs because I am thinking the only way the addition of 25m would need to be added was if the accelerations were the same, not sure why i can't grasp the idea, think I am just burnt out
ok perfect thank you, so what exactly am i saying when i say the displacement of car = displacement of truck +25.0 m, my brain is fried after today but I am having trouble understanding the theory behind it in lamens terms, my mind is wanting to think its the car +25 to make up for the deficit...
ok I think i got it but I think I've done way too many steps
2.20 m/s^2(t^2) +25.0m = 1.85 m/s ^s (t^2)
.35 m/s^2(t^2) +25.0m = 0
.35(t^2) = -25.0s^2
t^2 = -71.43 s^2
t= 8.45 s
Sorry, didn't realize that until i searched around a little more.
So far I have displacement of truck equals 1/2a x t^2 = 1.85 m/s^2(t^2)
I am thinking displacement of car = displacement of truck + 25.0 m = 1/2at^2
I am left with 1.85 m/s^2(t^2) = 2.20 m/s^2(t^2) + 25.0 m?? This is where I am...
A truck and a car both start from rest at the same time on a straight track. The car is 25.0 m behind the truck at the start. The truck accelerates at 3.70 m/s^2 and the car accelerates at 4.40 m/s^2. How long does it take for the car to catch up to the truck?
Hey all, first post, didn't think...