Life on Earth started approximately 3.5 billion years ago. On Earth's surface there was a finite quantity of carbon, among other finite building blocks of life. Organisms absorb this carbon, then they die. After death the organisms carbon (and other life essential ingredients) are released and...
I tend to think about it this way, different people have different views of reality. Between the two is a whole host of probabilities and both might not agree on something, eg, whether two objects that can't be moved are the same height. While they don't agree, reality is split into two...
Isn't both the angular momentum and the momentum conserved though? What makes them different and can they behave in dependant of one an other?
If an astronaut in space lands on the axis of the moon then will he only gain angular momentum or will he gain both angular momentum and normal...
I don't really know what it's called but an object moving in an orbit is curving and everything is moving in an orbit. Thus nothing is moving in straight lines unless it'snot orbiting that is. The only thing that I can think of that isn't orbiting is an object falling into the Centre of the...
I understand that nothing is exact in terms of mathmatical abstracts not actually being reality but there is a massive mathmatical difference between a straight line and a curved one. The double slit experiment requires straight lines. I'm simply inferring that perhaps particles and objects move...
I get the conservation of momentum law that states that objects always have conserved momentum. I can easily accept this with the view that while an object appears to be at rest it is actually speeding through the universe at a massive speed. I just have the same speed so relative to myself the...