Yes. You are right.
Guess that what I first meant to say is that
lim r→−∞ V(r, α/2 ± ε) = 0 , ε ≥ 0
In some area around the two planes where r→∞, V→0;
The other option would be V→∞ when r→∞. I don't think so, but I can't strongly argue the reason.
Yes. I have just find out that I should have ϕ(r) = r^{−λ}.
Thanks again!PS: I need to finish this and other questions in 1 hour at least. Back to work!
Lol.. it was very easy to solve the ODE... I think I can re write the last equations to:
* r² ϕ''(r) + rϕ'(r) − λ²ϕ(r) = 0 (*)
* ψ''(θ) + λ²ψ(θ) = 0 (**)
So, I'll have
ψ(θ) = A cos λθ + B sin λθ
ϕ(r) = r^{λ}
My solution, so, would be V(r,θ) = r^{λ} ( A cos λθ + B...
Homework Statement
Two semi-infinite conductor planes (like this ∠ ) have an angle β at a constant potential.
Whats the potencial close to the origin?
Homework Equations
∇²V = (1/r)(∂/∂r){ r ( ∂V/∂r ) } + (1/r²)(∂²V/∂\theta²)
The Attempt at a Solution
Trying for laplacian equation on...