Recent content by castrogiovanni

Try MIT, Harvard, Oxford, Cambridge, etc. They may be able to help. Although, as previously mentioned, if they knew how to do it they would have done, and you wouldn't be here asking the question.

As Ned Wright says; http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/tiredlit.htm

Because of the reasons already given. If light tires by distance, then the further galaxies should be more blurred. This is not the case. And it is a prediction that the time dilation factor expected for the supernovae should follow an expected rate for expansion. It does. This also rules out...

Tired light models are long since debunked. They are the claims of those who want to cling on to the pre-Big Bang, 'steady state' cosmology. Most of its remaining proponents are slowly dying off. The 'theory' falls over in various ways. Not least due to the fact that galaxies would be expected...

One thing to keep in mind is that although there are induced currents within the magnetosphere, as mentioned, quasi-neutrality outside of the magnetosphere will cause any separation of ions and electrons to be limited to the Debye length. That is about 10m in the solar wind. Essentially, and as...

Because tired light theories are wrong? :)