I only witnessed two people that understood the logic of INP. I suspect I found a solution (below). This may bring a new layer of math I was speaking of:
Trinity Number System:
0.0.0 = exp . mul . inc
exp = exponential
mul = multiple
inc = incremental = remainder
It is...
Regarding different bases, the IDP does not disappear, it just shifts in correspondence to the type of base. Both bases below have the same fraction values:
BASE-3:
1/1 = 1
1/2 = 0.111...
1/10 = 0.1
BASE-10:
1/1 = 1
1/2 = 0.5
1/3 = 0.333...
In regards to...
If you change the base it just shifts where the INP takes place in your written notation. Nothing has been solved, so-to-speak. It is almost as if there is something in nature that won't allow for clean-cut division at particular regions/magnitudes in physics.
Let's say we have a thin strip...
This has been aggravating me for years. Call it "IDP" as a placeholder name for now, if you will. How come irrational numbers keep propelling forward for particular divisions? My inquiry applies for both repeating and non-repeating irrational numbers. "Just is" or "You're thinking too much into...
Yeah, the glitter-like gold doesn't sink favorably either. Are you stating that even glitter-size gold sinks? Is there any other kind of test I can run on it?
Hmm, some noteworthy quibbles going around.
What about Forestman's statement of particle accelarators (CERN etc)? Why can't we fabricate elements? What is stopping us from fusing sub-atomic particles?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way"
This is disturbingly intriguing. Wiki states the diameter and the thickness, but that cannot be it, could it? Is not a electromagnetic, wavelength measurement from "crest to crest?"
A galaxy = planets + gas + space debris = matter. Wikipedia had the Milky Way's mass so how would one derive the wavelength of a galaxy (attachment above) from a side view. Has this ever been calculated in science?
I am creating this wavelength chart (attached).
I was told to use Compton's formula; I got this:
(6.626068 × (10^(-34))) / (1.1542e+42 * 299 792 458) = 1.91493535 × 10-84
Apparently, it is substantially off scale. I was then told to try de Broglie wave. Wikipedia only shows relations...