Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
David_Vancouver
Recent content by David_Vancouver
D
Epsilon-Delta Proofs: Understanding the Process
But aren't those suggestive calculations definitive? That is, they are always true?
David_Vancouver
Post #3
Oct 2, 2006
Forum:
Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
D
Epsilon-Delta Proofs: Understanding the Process
Hi, Why is it, that when ever epsilon-delta proofs are done, once delta is found in terms of epsilon, it is reinputed through again? Is there any point to this really?
David_Vancouver
Thread
Oct 2, 2006
Delta
Epsilon
Epsilon delta
Proofs
Replies: 3
Forum:
Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
D
Question: How to Justify the Steps in Proving a Limit?
Sorry this part: if 0 < |x + 2| < 1 then, -3 < x < -1 |x - 2| < 5 is a "side part"
David_Vancouver
Post #5
Oct 2, 2006
Forum:
Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
D
Question: How to Justify the Steps in Proving a Limit?
Perhaps this way would work: Prove that lim x->-2 (x^2-1)=3 let E > 0 be given and: |f(x) - L| = |x^2 - 4| = |(x - 2)(x + 2)| = |x - 2||x + 2| if 0 < |x + 2| < 1 then, -3 < x < -1 |x - 2| < 5 < 5|x + 2| therefore: if 0 < |x + 2| < 1 and 5|x + 2| < E then by...
David_Vancouver
Post #4
Oct 2, 2006
Forum:
Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Forums
David_Vancouver
Back
Top