Recent content by exponent137

Muon g-2 announcement:

There is a new release of data. The upper limit of the sum of neutrino masses is still ever 0,07 eV? Namely, according to the Naredo paper, there should be some outliers in data. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.12022

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_field_equations If we study when the sun bent the light of the stars behind it, which above terms have the largest influence, and which can be neglected? (I think that the third term can be neglected for such phenomena.) And what changes when we are close...

I thought nothing negative with this sentence. Only for evidence, I gave 1/2 year. It is a natural law, it seems. It was one post one year ago when someone explicitly criticized such delay. I did not.

And the next data release happened, half a year later after it was promised: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13516 The new upper bound is mν<0.45 eV. Was this paper the first announcement?

I read. One option is for the degenerate case. I suppose that this option is contrary to the measured mass differences of neutrinos? If it is in contradiction with measurements, why it is used? Maybe because it gives some simplified information?

So, is 0.113 eV the more correct answer? Let us ignore IH. What is the point of 0.072 eV? To show that the results are more precise?

One question: In https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.03002.pdf it is written in the abstract: "upper limit Sum mν < 0.072 (0.113) eV at 95% confidence for a Sum mν > 0 (Sum mν > 0.059) eV prior." To which value we can believe more, 0.072 eV, or to 0.113 eV?

The latest pdg update of the max. possible sum of neutrino masses is sum<0,12 eV at Normal Order. https://pdg.lbl.gov/2023/reviews/rpp2023-rev-astrophysical-constants.pdf The latest measurement and calculation gives sum<0,111 eV. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09703 What is now with the status of...

Yes, in principle, we are waiting for ∼ 0.5 eV. It was predicted at the end of the year 2023. But here, this prediction was repeated; maybe the update is close. About 0,75 eV: I do not understand, but it is not as important as 0.5 eV. But I hope that this is more than rounding...

News about KATRIN: https://www.katrin.kit.edu/130.php#Anker0 https://pos.sissa.it/431/011/pdf "Currently the combined analysis for measurement campaigns one to five is ongoing with an expected sensitivity of ∼ 0.5 eV." But it seems that value 0,75 eV is a new one? "The KATRIN collaboration has...

It is not wrong how he thinks. It is wrong if he does not use the scientific method. (But also scientific method is not absolute truth.)

It is not good to use the name "crackpottery" for ideas of people, who try to follow the scientific method and they quit when it is proved that they are wrong. This also happens. The scientific method is not so bad also for unorthodox scientists, but orthodox scientists also abuse it for the...

By end of year 2023 KATRIN will release their results (page 26): https://indico.in2p3.fr/event/29681/contributions/122472/attachments/76424/110930/04-TLasserre-v1.pdf And then in 2025. "next data release by end 2023 (<0.5 eV sensitivity) target sensitivity: m < 0.2-0.3 eV by 2025"

For a moment, let us forget about the measurements of g-2. Can we say that the BMW assumptions are more logical and correct than these of the Standard Model? Or, this is not clear?