correct,
this tought being based on the fact that in any moment in time, the mass has a linear velocity equal to the orbital speed, so enough to "orbit"
the fact that the object also rotates around a vertical axis should not change anything
I understand this is weird, however I have troubles...
yes I consider rotation about the axis (say the axis is vertical)
The point I'm trying to make here is different.
we say that the 8000m/sec is the linear velocity of a mass required to balance out the gravity force applied to it (orbital speed)
a mass rotating about a vertical axis at 1m and...
It is known that 8000m/sec is the speed required for an object traveling parallel to the Earth's surface to orbit (i.e. so that the centripetal force counteracts the gravity force).
I am now thinking to an object linked to an axis of rotation (e.g. with a 1m string) and rotating about that axis...