This was quoted from Eh on the thread "do we see in three dimensions?"
"The gist of it would seem correct. We cannot imagine a 4 dimensional object because we cannot even know what a 3 dimensional object looks like. We never see volumes - only the surfaces of objects. That doesn't prevent us...
You can imagine a woman's skin at most. Maybe you can imagine them with clothes on. But to imagine a woman in three dimensions, you would have to imagine her as an MRI scan. All the way thru. Seeing every particle of her body at one time. There is another thread on wether we see in two or three...
"Since consciousness uses perception from the third dimension, than consciousness must infact exist on a higher dimension. (I.E. six squares making a cube)
If thoughts does exist on a higher dimension, than the laws of the 3rd dimension do not apply, meaning thought has unlimited speed...
She probably didn't know what running water meant. (I'm sure she took showers and drank it). She probably wondered what the smell of the fresh cut grass or of the carbon monoxide outside her window meant. Maybe this was due to her parents fear of bringing her outside. She probably wasn't very...
We all seem to think differently about God no matter what. Shadowman sees God as an individual somewhere out there all-knowing, all-seeing.
I can't understand what ten-years mean by the opposite. You mean to say that God perceive us?
"o.. you mean that God is not a single entity, but is...
"If we theorize the existence of two kinds of mass: the potential and the kinetic.."
By definition, kinetic (energy) is energy being converted while potential is energy stored. If a mass is kinetic, then it would refer to the transition from mass to energy as per say a fire. and potential...
I guess I sin for not knowing the story. If I am not mistaken, we are referring to conciousness from the beginning. The question was asked wether conciousness is related or not to the thought process. And if conciousness can travel through other dimensions, then is conciousness faster than the...
I see. But itsn mass related to energy? if there is enough energy in vacuum, there should be enough potential for mass. I wonder what would it take for a lot of energy to become mass?
As absurd as it may sound, I have to say "sort of". I have no idea who Hellen Keller is but I am assuming she lacks of some senses (sight and hearing?). Impaired people do develop their remaining senses to a sharp point. Furthermore, some people would argue that they develop their "sixth sense"...
I have to come back to my original question that some people have agreed upon. We see in two dimensions. Someone said 2 1/2. So we do reduce our field of vision below 3 + 1 frames. I also don't know if we can't see electricity and magnetism because they are in a different dimension or because...